Talk:History of Pittsburgh/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(add ToApprove tag to talk page per Approval Manager)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(pick one)
Line 5: Line 5:
Well now, you're onto a ''different'' argument. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:12, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Well now, you're onto a ''different'' argument. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:12, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
::yes but it's compelling too. CZ should not have a 1990s look and feel.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:15, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
::yes but it's compelling too. CZ should not have a 1990s look and feel.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:15, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Hi guys,  This is getting confusing.  As a constable, I have to tell you that the decision about naming needs to be made so that we can "move" pages instead of copy and pasting.  We are losing page histories in the process and we have two articles with the same content.  I am concerned that clean-up of these articles are going to get lost when one name is chosen over the other...  Doesn't matter to me which it is.  --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 21:05, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:05, 24 April 2007


Toapprove.png
Richard Jensen has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The History Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on May 1, 2007.

Titles--anyone who looks at the bibliography will notice that historians rarely title their work, "The History of XYZ" -- it's not normally done these days and CZ should not do it either. Richard Jensen 18:09, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Well now, you're onto a different argument. --Larry Sanger 18:12, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

yes but it's compelling too. CZ should not have a 1990s look and feel.Richard Jensen 19:15, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Hi guys, This is getting confusing. As a constable, I have to tell you that the decision about naming needs to be made so that we can "move" pages instead of copy and pasting. We are losing page histories in the process and we have two articles with the same content. I am concerned that clean-up of these articles are going to get lost when one name is chosen over the other... Doesn't matter to me which it is. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:05, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Pittsburgh/Archive_3&oldid=207535"