Talk:Computer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito
imported>Pat Palmer
Line 37: Line 37:
== question ==
== question ==
a rapic evolution can also be changed into revolution, and if we talk about microprocessor computing we do talk about the digital revolution. Any objection to changing that part? [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:black">&nbsp;<font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span> 17:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
a rapic evolution can also be changed into revolution, and if we talk about microprocessor computing we do talk about the digital revolution. Any objection to changing that part? [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:black">&nbsp;<font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span> 17:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
::I'm not sure what you're asking, but edit what you think best.  I'd recommend avoiding getting too detailed about technology, however.  Perhaps that discussion would belong better in [[history of computing]], which hopefully will have a breakdown of developments by decade.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 17:57, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:57, 23 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Computer"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





archives of previous discussions

Discussion Archives
Archive 1, 4-23-07: Talk:Computer/Archive1
Archive 2, 4-23-07: Talk:Computer/Archive2
Archive 3, date-here Talk:Computer/Archive3


archived everything; starting over

I have archived previous discussions, since I totally reorganized Computer, sending most of the old stuff either to Computer architecture or to History of computing (new article).Pat Palmer 17:14, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

question

a rapic evolution can also be changed into revolution, and if we talk about microprocessor computing we do talk about the digital revolution. Any objection to changing that part? Robert Tito |  Talk  17:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

I'm not sure what you're asking, but edit what you think best. I'd recommend avoiding getting too detailed about technology, however. Perhaps that discussion would belong better in history of computing, which hopefully will have a breakdown of developments by decade.Pat Palmer 17:57, 23 April 2007 (CDT)