Talk:Academic journal: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Line 15: Line 15:


I do not think it practical to use the external links to be a place to list the links to potentially every scholarly journal. Should probably be limited to a comprehensive site (if there is one). Ok to delete these links to specific journal(s)? - [[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 11:54, 8 April 2008 (CDT)
I do not think it practical to use the external links to be a place to list the links to potentially every scholarly journal. Should probably be limited to a comprehensive site (if there is one). Ok to delete these links to specific journal(s)? - [[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 11:54, 8 April 2008 (CDT)
They should be deleted. We have already had this discussion over earlier articles on disciplinary academic journals, and there was agreement that it is ridiculous to try to list all in a discipline and unreasonable and unnecessarily elitist to list only a few. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 19:00, 8 April 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:00, 8 April 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A regularly-published, peer-reviewed publication that publishes scholarship relating to an academic discipline. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Library and Information Science [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Category

As far as I know, this is a candidate for Education, Media, Business, and even Journalism.

And perhaps this isn't "developed"? --Larry Sanger 15:46, 9 March 2007 (CST) Well, I rewrote most of it about 6 months ago at WP from a fairly good earlier start I found there--and there have been some good subsequent improvements in WP worth putting in and I will do so in the next week. I've always thought of articles like this as an overlap with media and journalism. I tend not to think about business more than I can help, but it wouldn't be irrelevant, unless it ends up trying to serve too broad a constituency. The main thing it needs before being submitted for approval is references. It was essentially written out of personal knowledge by all of the people who worked on it. It may take till the end of February until I can get to it. And then i think I'd submit it for approval, to one of the other library science editors. I will ask on the list there.& mention it on the other forums for comments.

I ask the others--this refers to a slightly more specific article on scientific journal, also rewritten at about the same time. On WP people were using academic/scientific interchangeably. I am not sure that the articles shouldn't be merged into a single longer article , with sections for humanities also, as there is a great deal of overlap. Opinions welcome. DavidGoodman 05:12, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

External links

I do not think it practical to use the external links to be a place to list the links to potentially every scholarly journal. Should probably be limited to a comprehensive site (if there is one). Ok to delete these links to specific journal(s)? - Robert Badgett 11:54, 8 April 2008 (CDT)

They should be deleted. We have already had this discussion over earlier articles on disciplinary academic journals, and there was agreement that it is ridiculous to try to list all in a discipline and unreasonable and unnecessarily elitist to list only a few. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 19:00, 8 April 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Academic_journal&oldid=161867"