Talk:Ganges River/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "River Ganges" to "Ganges River") Tag: Manual revert |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Ganga" to "Ganges River") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Merger == | == Merger == | ||
Following [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:John_Stephenson&oldid=100844366#About_article_Ganges this request]: as this is an [[:Category:External Articles|external article]], in that it is an [[CZ:Import|import]] that has not been extensively worked on, it is a candidate for removal at the request of any citizen. As we prefer new material, I suggest deleting it altogether to allow for a merger with [[ | Following [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:John_Stephenson&oldid=100844366#About_article_Ganges this request]: as this is an [[:Category:External Articles|external article]], in that it is an [[CZ:Import|import]] that has not been extensively worked on, it is a candidate for removal at the request of any citizen. As we prefer new material, I suggest deleting it altogether to allow for a merger with [[Ganges River]]. Unless there are objections, I'll do so in a few days. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 17:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:09, 8 March 2024
Again: why not Ganges River?
Of course, the way to determine the question is to examine how exemplary English writers and editors refer to the river. --Larry Sanger 05:08, 6 August 2007 (CDT)
Titles of river articles
There is a general agreement that river articles should include the word river in their titles. If you have created one or more river articles without following this agreement, please move them accordingly. See this Section on my talk page for more information (discussion initiated by David E. Volk).
Merger
Following this request: as this is an external article, in that it is an import that has not been extensively worked on, it is a candidate for removal at the request of any citizen. As we prefer new material, I suggest deleting it altogether to allow for a merger with Ganges River. Unless there are objections, I'll do so in a few days. John Stephenson 17:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)