Filartiga v. Pena-Irala/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} ==Parent topics== {{r|International law}} {{r|Hostis humani generis}} {{r|Universal jurisdiction}} {{r|U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals}} ==Subtopics== <!-- List topic...) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{r|Universal jurisdiction}}" to "") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{r|International law}} | {{r|International law}} | ||
{{r|Hostis humani generis}} | {{r|Hostis humani generis}} | ||
{{r|U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals}} | {{r|U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals}} | ||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{r|Forti v. Suarez Mason}} | {{r|Forti v. Suarez Mason}} | ||
{{r|Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason}} | {{r|Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason}} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 29 May 2024
- See also changes related to Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, or pages that link to Filartiga v. Pena-Irala or to this page or whose text contains "Filartiga v. Pena-Irala".
Parent topics
- International law [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Hostis humani generis [r]: A legal principle that certain acts, such as piracy, slavery and genocide, puts one outside the norms of civilization and makes one an "enemy of all mankind", subject to early forms of universal jurisdiction or summary action [e]
Subtopics
- Forti v. Suarez Mason [r]: A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of hostis humani generis applied to torturers, and thus placed them under universal jurisdiction, such that they could be appreheded by any country even though the torture had taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country [e]
- Martinez Baca v. Suarez Mason [r]: Add brief definition or description