User:Nick Gardner: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
m (Text replacement - "History of the United Kingdom" to "History of England")
 
(58 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
''Nick Gardner has passed away''
==Biography:==
==Biography:==


Nick Gardner is retired after successive careers  as a flight test observer, as a professional engineer, and  as an economist. He has worked in two industrial companies, a research establishment and four government  departments;  and served as economic adviser to four cabinet ministers. As an engineer he was engaged in aeronautical research and development  including  the development of new  manufacturing processes, he took part in the Concorde project and he visited the Apollo project. As an economist he evaluated numerous aerospace projects, he played a part in the development of UK competition policy and he managed a major statistical series. During his working life he contributed to several professional journals and symposiums on subjects including spotwelding, launching aid and project management, and since retirement he has written a book on contemporary economic history and another on competition policy that was published in three editions.  His latest book is ''Mistakes – how they have happened and how some might be avoided''.
I am long  retired after successive careers  as a flight test observer, as a professional engineer, and  as an economist. I have worked in two industrial companies, a research establishment and four government  departments;  and I have served as economic adviser to four cabinet ministers. As an engineer I was engaged in aeronautical research and development  including  the development of new  manufacturing processes, I took part in the Concorde project and I visited the Apollo project. As an economist I evaluated numerous aerospace projects, I played a part in the development of UK competition policy and I managed a major statistical series. During my working life I contributed to several professional journals and symposiums on subjects including spotwelding, launching aid and project management, and since retirement I have  written several books. One was a book on contemporary economic history and another on competition policy that was published in three editions.  My latest book ''Mistakes – how they have happened and how some might be avoided'' was published in 2007. My writing activity since that date has been confined to Citizendium, and I have become Citizendium's most frequent contributor.
Nick  is mainly interested in how people form beliefs and how they make decisions. Pursuit of that interest has led him to explore published work in the fields of philosophy, cognitive psychology, neuroscience, genetics, economics, politics, media studies, religion  and decision theory. His CZ contributions have mainly been on the economics and his principal CZ objective has been  to attract constructive criticism from fellow-economists and, with their help, to develop articles that provide a wide range of readers with a clearer perception of economic issues than can be gained from other sources.
 
==Planned contributions==


I now have advanced metastatic prostate cancer, and I have decided to use the limited time left to me to create a second edition of "Mistakes" (as an ebook). My CZ contributions from now on will be limited to brief updates of the current affairs articles.


===Articles to complete or update===
==CZ activities==


====High priority====
===Membership===
I became a member of the Editorial Council in 2011.


*[[Macroprudential financial policy]] complete paragraphs on costs and benefits and policy decisions
===Aims===
*[[Recession of 2009]] review and update'''[[http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40104_20090227.pdf]]
My early hopes of collaboration on articles with fellow-economists have been disappointed, but my early aim of filling in the gaps in CZ's coverage of the basics of economics has been met - apart from some tidying-up. However, I have since realised that people have a need for clarification of  ongoing events, of a sort that is not fully available from the  other media, or from paper encylopedias - a need that  Citizendium is well placed to supply. I have found the task of keeping such articles abreast of current developments to be a demanding one, that leaves little time for other CZ activities.
*[[Social capital]] add paragraphs on political implications[http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/posner/pdfs/social_cap_explain.pdf][http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/NV-eng-state.htm#ER]
* [[Applied statistics]] add a paragraph on statistical interpretation.


====Medium priority====
===Approach===
*[[Recession (economics)]] develop timeline and add Japanese recession [http://www.bis.org/publ/work188.pdf?noframes=1]
I have taken the view that Citizendium's main function is to serve the needs of educated laymen and that material on the main page should be confined to matter that such readers can understand.
* [[bank failures and rescues]] more on Nordic and Asian crises [[http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2009doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00000DDE/$FILE/JT03260699.PDF]].
* [[balance of payments]] expand using Wolf p201
* [[cost-benefit analysis]] add material on limitations of welfare economics
* [[crash of 1929]] add links to subpages and complete the tutorials subpage and use some of Gillian Tet's material
* [[deflation]] add historical data from Bordo and Filado [http://www.bis.org/publ/work186.pdf]
* [[financial system]] consider reference to White [http://www.bis.org/publ/work193.pdf?noframes=1]
* [[Fiscal policy]]  complete paragraphs on welfare and stabilisation
* [[rpl|Liberalism]]  see talk page
* [[rpl|money supply]] add paragraphs on determinants, control and economic effects
* [[multiplier effect]] add text to existing opening


====Low priority====
===Methodology===
* [[Market]] add efficient market hypothesis
Citizendium's subpage format enables the  otherwise confusingly three-dimensional character of articles that have a global reach to be dealt with by:-<br>
*[[Justice]] add material from Sen (2009) "The Idea of Justice"
(a) an  accessible overview on the main page for the benefit of the general reader  (supported  by  statistics, theoretical analysis and diagrams  on subpages for the benefit of the more sophisticated);<br>
===New articles===
(b)  a  blow-by-blow chronology  on the Timelines subpage with hyperlinks to contemporary accounts to enable researchers to follow up on  matters that are too detailed for inclusion in the main page; and,<br>
{{rpl|Impossibility theorem}}
(c)  a country-by-country  account on the Addendum subpage to  provide  a chronologically coherent account  of national developments (such as  would be a distracting  interruption of the  account of  global interactions  were it placed  on the main page.)<br>
{{rpl|Social choice theory}}


==Past Contributions==
I see as an advantage of this format, that it makes a Citizendium article
look unlike a Wikipedia article - signalling a different approach, rather than an attempt to compete
 
I have used that format in [[Great Recession]], [[Eurozone crisis]], [[Arab Spring]] and other articles.


Nick has made substantial contributions to CZ articles on:-
===Articles===
I have made substantial contributions to more than 80 CZ articles, of which 5 have been approved.
Few have attracted much talk page comment, but many score an above-average number of hits (the figure in [] brackets is the number of thousands of hits to the nearest thousand)..
{{rpl|antitrust}}
{{rpl|antitrust}}
{{rpl|applied statistics}}
{{rpl|applied statistics}}
{{rpl|Arab Spring}} [5]
{{rpl|balance of payments}}
{{rpl|balance of payments}}
{{rpl|banking}}
{{rpl|banking}}[4]
{{rpl|bank failures and rescues}}
{{rpl|bank failures and rescues}}
{{rpl|Bank for International Settlements}}
{{rpl|Bank for International Settlements}}
{{rpl|Britain, history}}
{{rpl|Tony Blair}}[14]
{{rpl|Gordon Brown}}
{{rpl|comparative advantage}}
{{rpl|competition}}
{{rpl|competition policy}}  
{{rpl|crash of 1929}}
{{rpl|crash of 1929}}
{{rpl|crash of 2008}}
{{rpl|crash of 2008}}
{{rpl|credit rating agency}}
{{rpl|debt}}
{{rpl|deflation}}
{{rpl|deflation}}
{{rpl|discount rate}}
{{rpl|discount rate}}
{{rpl|comparative advantage}}
{{rpl|competition}}
{{rpl|competition policy}}
{{rpl|economics}}
{{rpl|economics}}
{{rpl|economic efficiency}}
{{rpl|economic efficiency}}
{{rpl|Elasticity (economics)}}
{{rpl|elasticity (economics)}}
{{rpl|EU competition policy}}  
{{rpl|employment}}
{{rpl|EU competition policy}}
{{rpl|Europe}}
{{rpl|European Union}}
{{rpl|Eurozone}}
{{rpl|Eurozone crisis}}[14]
{{rpl|financial economics}}
{{rpl|financial economics}}
{{rpl|Financial Stability Forum}}
{{rpl|Financial Stability Forum}}
{{rpl|Financial system}}
{{rpl|financial system}}[6]
{{rpl|Gold standard}}
{{rpl|financial regulation}}
{{rpl|fiscal policy}}[4]
{{rpl|gold standard}}
{{rpl|Government Sponsored Enterprises}}
{{rpl|Government Sponsored Enterprises}}
{{rpl|Great Depression}}
{{rpl|Great Depression}}[8]
{{rpl|Great Depression in Britain}}
{{rpl|Great Depression in Britain}}
{{rpl|Great Depression in the United States}}
{{rpl|Great Depression in the United States}}
{{rpl|Great Recession}}[5]
{{rpl|gross domestic product}}
{{rpl|gross domestic product}}
{{rpl|Group of Twenty}}
{{rpl|G20 summit}}
{{rpl|G20 summit}}
{{rpl|history of economic thought}}
{{rpl|history of economic thought}}[5]
{{rpl|history of political thought}}
{{rpl|history of the United Kingdom}}[4]
{{rpl|House of Commons (United Kingdom)}}
{{rpl|House of Lords}}
{{rpl|Human rights}}
{{rpl|inflation}}
{{rpl|inflation}}
{{rpl|international economics}}  
{{rpl|international economics}} [5]
{{rpl|International Monetary Fund}}
{{rpl|International Monetary Fund}}
{{rpl|IS-LM model}}  
{{rpl|IS-LM model}}
{{rpl|London}}[5]
{{rpl|macroeconomics}}
{{rpl|macroeconomics}}
{{rpl|Karl Marx}}+
{{rpl|microeconomics}}
{{rpl|microeconomics}}
{{rpl|microfinance}}
{{rpl|mistakes}}
{{rpl|money supply}}
{{rpl|money supply}}
{{rpl|Monetary policy}}
{{rpl|monetarism}}
{{rpl|National Debt}}
{{rpl|monetary policy}} [4]
{{rpl|national Debt}}
{{rpl|New Deal}}
{{rpl|New Deal}}
{{rpl|Parliament of the United Kingdom}}
{{rpl|politics}}     
{{rpl|politics}}     
{{rpl|political party}}  
{{rpl|political party}}  
Line 83: Line 101:
{{rpl|price index}}
{{rpl|price index}}
{{rpl|production function}}
{{rpl|production function}}
{{rpl|Public expenditure}}  
{{rpl|public expenditure}}  
{{rpl|Public good}}
{{rpl|public good}}
{{rpl|recession (economics)}}
{{rpl|recession (economics)}}
{{rpl|recession of 2008}}
{{rpl|recession of 2008}}
{{rpl|social capital}}
{{rpl|social capital}}
{{rpl|subprime mortgage crisis}}  
{{rpl|sovereign default}}
{{rpl|subprime mortgage crisis}}[4]
{{rpl|supply and demand}}
{{rpl|supply and demand}}
{{rpl|Taxation}}
{{rpl|taxation}}[5]
{{rpl|terms of trade}}
{{rpl|terms of trade}}
{{rpl|Washington Consensus}}
{{rpl|Washington Consensus}}
Line 96: Line 115:
{{rpl|World Bank}}
{{rpl|World Bank}}


:Nick, which of those would you like considered for approval.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 17:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
::Anthony, Rather a lot, I'm afraid. There's a list of economics articles ready for approval at [[CZ: Ready for approval#Economics]]  with stars to suggest priority. Apart from the economics articles, I would like you to give priority to [[Europe]],  [[History of England]] and the group of 3 recently-completed articles on [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]], [[House of Commons (United Kingdom)]] and [[House of Lords]]. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
:::Nick, I can get the Approval Process started for those.  To avoid interminable delays, will you suggest Editors in the relevant Workgroups whom I can contact to review and support the nomination for Approval if they have no objections.


:::As I begin this job as Approval Manager, finding Editors in relevant Workgroups willing to review and support nominations for Approval, the most difficult aspect.  Your recommendations will greatly help.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 20:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


[[Category:CZ Editors|Gardner, Nick]]
::::The lack of active editors is the reason for the fact that few of my articles have been considered for approval. Since I am the only economics editor, I suppose the economics articles can't be considered. As for the others, the only politics and history editors that I have known to be active were Roger Lohman and Russell D Jones respectively, but I have seen no  signs of CZ activity from either of them in the past year. Perhaps you can cajole them into action. I respect them both. Good luck! [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 20:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
<!--[[Category:CZ Editors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:Economics Editors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:Economics Editors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:CZ Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:CZ Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
Line 104: Line 130:
[[Category:Economics Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:Economics Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:Politics Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:Politics Authors|Gardner, Nick]]
[[Category:CZ Editorial Council Members|Gardner, Nick]]-->
[[Category:CZ Editorial Council Emeritus Members]]


==Easily lost links==
==Easily lost links==
Line 110: Line 138:


[[CZ: The Editor Role]]
[[CZ: The Editor Role]]
[[CZ:Markup tags for partial transclusion of selected text in an article]]
[[CZ:Article Deletion Policy]]
[[CZ:Upload]]
[[CZ:Statistics#Daily_contributors]]

Latest revision as of 00:13, 9 February 2024


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Nick Gardner has passed away

Biography:

I am long retired after successive careers as a flight test observer, as a professional engineer, and as an economist. I have worked in two industrial companies, a research establishment and four government departments; and I have served as economic adviser to four cabinet ministers. As an engineer I was engaged in aeronautical research and development including the development of new manufacturing processes, I took part in the Concorde project and I visited the Apollo project. As an economist I evaluated numerous aerospace projects, I played a part in the development of UK competition policy and I managed a major statistical series. During my working life I contributed to several professional journals and symposiums on subjects including spotwelding, launching aid and project management, and since retirement I have written several books. One was a book on contemporary economic history and another on competition policy that was published in three editions. My latest book Mistakes – how they have happened and how some might be avoided was published in 2007. My writing activity since that date has been confined to Citizendium, and I have become Citizendium's most frequent contributor.

I now have advanced metastatic prostate cancer, and I have decided to use the limited time left to me to create a second edition of "Mistakes" (as an ebook). My CZ contributions from now on will be limited to brief updates of the current affairs articles.

CZ activities

Membership

I became a member of the Editorial Council in 2011.

Aims

My early hopes of collaboration on articles with fellow-economists have been disappointed, but my early aim of filling in the gaps in CZ's coverage of the basics of economics has been met - apart from some tidying-up. However, I have since realised that people have a need for clarification of ongoing events, of a sort that is not fully available from the other media, or from paper encylopedias - a need that Citizendium is well placed to supply. I have found the task of keeping such articles abreast of current developments to be a demanding one, that leaves little time for other CZ activities.

Approach

I have taken the view that Citizendium's main function is to serve the needs of educated laymen and that material on the main page should be confined to matter that such readers can understand.

Methodology

Citizendium's subpage format enables the otherwise confusingly three-dimensional character of articles that have a global reach to be dealt with by:-
(a) an accessible overview on the main page for the benefit of the general reader (supported by statistics, theoretical analysis and diagrams on subpages for the benefit of the more sophisticated);
(b) a blow-by-blow chronology on the Timelines subpage with hyperlinks to contemporary accounts to enable researchers to follow up on matters that are too detailed for inclusion in the main page; and,
(c) a country-by-country account on the Addendum subpage to provide a chronologically coherent account of national developments (such as would be a distracting interruption of the account of global interactions were it placed on the main page.)

I see as an advantage of this format, that it makes a Citizendium article look unlike a Wikipedia article - signalling a different approach, rather than an attempt to compete

I have used that format in Great Recession, Eurozone crisis, Arab Spring and other articles.

Articles

I have made substantial contributions to more than 80 CZ articles, of which 5 have been approved. Few have attracted much talk page comment, but many score an above-average number of hits (the figure in [] brackets is the number of thousands of hits to the nearest thousand)..

Nick, which of those would you like considered for approval. Anthony.Sebastian 17:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Anthony, Rather a lot, I'm afraid. There's a list of economics articles ready for approval at CZ: Ready for approval#Economics with stars to suggest priority. Apart from the economics articles, I would like you to give priority to Europe, History of England and the group of 3 recently-completed articles on Parliament of the United Kingdom, House of Commons (United Kingdom) and House of Lords. Nick Gardner 10:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Nick, I can get the Approval Process started for those. To avoid interminable delays, will you suggest Editors in the relevant Workgroups whom I can contact to review and support the nomination for Approval if they have no objections.
As I begin this job as Approval Manager, finding Editors in relevant Workgroups willing to review and support nominations for Approval, the most difficult aspect. Your recommendations will greatly help. Anthony.Sebastian 20:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
The lack of active editors is the reason for the fact that few of my articles have been considered for approval. Since I am the only economics editor, I suppose the economics articles can't be considered. As for the others, the only politics and history editors that I have known to be active were Roger Lohman and Russell D Jones respectively, but I have seen no signs of CZ activity from either of them in the past year. Perhaps you can cajole them into action. I respect them both. Good luck! Nick Gardner 20:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Easily lost links

CZ: Ready for approval#Economics

CZ: The Editor Role

CZ:Markup tags for partial transclusion of selected text in an article

CZ:Article Deletion Policy CZ:Upload

CZ:Statistics#Daily_contributors