Talk:Embryology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Ro Thorpe
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than  engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than  engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)


Cut from article: {{Embryology}}
Cut from article: {{Embryology}}
== Inappropriate capitals ==
need removing by someone fitter than me. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:53, 5 September 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 17:53, 5 September 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The study of how organisms develop between the times of conception and birth. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology and Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.DavidGoodman 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)

Cut from article: Template:Embryology

Inappropriate capitals

need removing by someone fitter than me. Ro Thorpe 18:53, 5 September 2008 (CDT)