Talk:Embryology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Ro Thorpe (→Inappropriate capitals: new section) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST) | Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Cut from article: {{Embryology}} | Cut from article: {{Embryology}} | ||
== Inappropriate capitals == | |||
need removing by someone fitter than me. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:53, 5 September 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:53, 5 September 2008
Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.DavidGoodman 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)
Cut from article: Template:Embryology
Inappropriate capitals
need removing by someone fitter than me. Ro Thorpe 18:53, 5 September 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Biology Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles