Ex parte Quirin/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "United States}}" to "United States of America}}") |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "{{r|War on terror}}" to "") |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{r|Jose Padilla}} | {{r|Jose Padilla}} | ||
{{r|Supreme Court of the United States of America}} | {{r|Supreme Court of the United States of America}} | ||
{{Bot-created_related_article_subpage}} | {{Bot-created_related_article_subpage}} | ||
<!-- Remove the section above after copying links to the other sections. --> | <!-- Remove the section above after copying links to the other sections. --> |
Revision as of 12:15, 8 March 2024
- See also changes related to Ex parte Quirin, or pages that link to Ex parte Quirin or to this page or whose text contains "Ex parte Quirin".
Parent topics
Subtopics
Bot-suggested topics
Auto-populated based on Special:WhatLinksHere/Ex parte Quirin. Needs checking by a human.
- Ex parte Milligan [r]: An 1866 decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined that a U.S. citizen, not part of the military or a prisoner of war, not in an area of hostilities, and where the civil courts were operating, could not be tried by a military tribunal [e]
- Extrajudicial detention, U.S., George W. Bush Administration [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Extrajudicial detention, U.S. [r]: Situations where the Executive Branch of the United States government has detained individuals without the authority of the judicial branch of government; there have been many cases going back to through the early history of the nation, sometimes during overt war, and, perhaps better known at present, directed against non-national threats. [e]
- Habeas corpus [r]: In common law, any of several types of writs requiring a person to be brought before a judge or court; esp. one designed to secure a person's release from unlawful detention. [e]
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2006 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, stating that there was no basis for trying, by U.S. military commission, a person captured in combat with U.S. allies on foreign soil, and turned over to U.S. forces [e]
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2004 opinion by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that a U.S. citizen, captured in a combat zone and alleged to be bearing arms against the United States, still was entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if he was an enemy combatant subject to military, rather than civilian, law [e]
- Intelligence interrogation, U.S., George W. Bush Administration [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Johnson v. Eisentrager [r]: A 1950 U.S. Supreme Court decision that nonresident enemy aliens, captured in the context of a declared war outside the jurisdiction of any U.S. civil court, were purely under the jurisdiction of military law and had no access to the U.S. judicial system [e]
- Jose Padilla [r]: An American citizen, convicted in 2007 of conspiring to assist in terrorism in foreign countries, who was originally arrested in 2002 by U.S. law enforcement, transferred by Presidential order to military custody and interrogation, and, as a result of Padilla v. Rumsfeld, sent back to civilian jurisdiction [e]
- Supreme Court of the United States of America [r]: Add brief definition or description