Wikipedia/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (+one)
imported>Tom Morris
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
* {{cite book |last= Lih |first= Andrew |authorlink= Andrew Lih |title= The Wikipedia Revolution: How a bunch of nobodies created the world's greatest encyclopedia |year= 2209 |coauthors= Jimmy Wales |publisher= Aurum |location= London |isbn= 9781845134730}}
*Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates: [http://howwikipediaworks.com/ How Wikipedia Works: And How You Can Be A Part of It]. [http://nostarch.com/ No Starch Press], 2008.
*Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates: [http://howwikipediaworks.com/ How Wikipedia Works: And How You Can Be A Part of It]. [http://nostarch.com/ No Starch Press], 2008.
*Priedhorsky, R., J. Chen, S.K. Lam, K. Panciera, L. Terveen and J. Riedl (2007) '[http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1316624.1316663 Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia]'. ''Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work''.
*Priedhorsky, R., J. Chen, S.K. Lam, K. Panciera, L. Terveen and J. Riedl (2007) '[http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1316624.1316663 Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia]'. ''Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work''.
*{{CZ:Ref:Giles 2005 Internet encyclopaedias go head to head}}
*{{CZ:Ref:Giles 2005 Internet encyclopaedias go head to head}}

Revision as of 05:44, 2 January 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
Activity [?]
 
A list of key readings about Wikipedia.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
A widely cited and debated study which compared the accuracy of 42 entries each in the English Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.