Talk:Planet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer No edit summary |
imported>Mark Widmer (→Pluto) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
I've splited the article into | == Note == | ||
I've splited the article into different parts, and also rewrited the introduction and the "etimology and history" part. [[User:Bruno L'Astorina|L'Astorina]] 16:57, 20 November 2007 (CST) | |||
== Pluto == | == Pluto == | ||
It might be useful to deal more directly with the controversy about whether [[Pluto]] should be considered a planet or not.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 17:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC) | It might be useful to deal more directly with the controversy about whether [[Pluto]] should be considered a planet or not.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 17:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
:I have added a note about Pluto right after the table of planets, for readers who only look at the table and wonder why it's missing there. There is additional info in the Intro section as well as the [[Pluto_(dwarf_planet)]] page, so it looks like we have it covered. [[User:Mark Widmer|Mark Widmer]] ([[User talk:Mark Widmer|talk]]) 23:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 9 August 2020
Note
I've splited the article into different parts, and also rewrited the introduction and the "etimology and history" part. L'Astorina 16:57, 20 November 2007 (CST)
Pluto
It might be useful to deal more directly with the controversy about whether Pluto should be considered a planet or not.Pat Palmer (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have added a note about Pluto right after the table of planets, for readers who only look at the table and wonder why it's missing there. There is additional info in the Intro section as well as the Pluto_(dwarf_planet) page, so it looks like we have it covered. Mark Widmer (talk) 23:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)