Talk:APP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (→layout: re to Andrew) |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Any comments on the subpages layout of this gene stub? Part of me thinks that we shouldn't use subpages until we have sufficient content to make a single-page article unwieldy. Compare to a single-page gene stub with similar content over at WP [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMP9]. I'm thinking that this type of layout might be better... With subpages, I need to click on all the tabs to get an overview which could be communicated almost as completely in a single page. Thoughts? [[User:Andrew Su|Andrew Su]] 14:59, 18 September 2007 (CDT) | Any comments on the subpages layout of this gene stub? Part of me thinks that we shouldn't use subpages until we have sufficient content to make a single-page article unwieldy. Compare to a single-page gene stub with similar content over at WP [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMP9]. I'm thinking that this type of layout might be better... With subpages, I need to click on all the tabs to get an overview which could be communicated almost as completely in a single page. Thoughts? [[User:Andrew Su|Andrew Su]] 14:59, 18 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Andrew, there is a discussion on this sort of thing on the forums [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1207.msg9832.html#msg9832]. You might want to add your 2 cents there to help make that decision. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 16:44, 18 September 2007 (CDT) | ::Andrew, there is a discussion on this sort of thing on the forums [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1207.msg9832.html#msg9832]. You might want to add your 2 cents there to help make that decision. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 16:44, 18 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Think expansion, this subpages layout allows that to occur. Also it would seem redundant to phenocopy the wikipedia layout. I think it will be more instructive to have this run at CZ an WP concurrently and see how both develop. It will also be interesting to see which format the community prefers to contribute too, ''i.e.'' anonymous with potential vandalism vs editing under real names but a more secure environment. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 17:23, 18 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:23, 18 September 2007
layout
Any comments on the subpages layout of this gene stub? Part of me thinks that we shouldn't use subpages until we have sufficient content to make a single-page article unwieldy. Compare to a single-page gene stub with similar content over at WP [1]. I'm thinking that this type of layout might be better... With subpages, I need to click on all the tabs to get an overview which could be communicated almost as completely in a single page. Thoughts? Andrew Su 14:59, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
- Andrew, there is a discussion on this sort of thing on the forums [2]. You might want to add your 2 cents there to help make that decision. --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:44, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
- Think expansion, this subpages layout allows that to occur. Also it would seem redundant to phenocopy the wikipedia layout. I think it will be more instructive to have this run at CZ an WP concurrently and see how both develop. It will also be interesting to see which format the community prefers to contribute too, i.e. anonymous with potential vandalism vs editing under real names but a more secure environment. Chris Day (talk) 17:23, 18 September 2007 (CDT)