User talk:Mark D. Gottsegen: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Waldo Peirce article: trying to get it Approved) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 08:15, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 08:15, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
{{ewelcome}} --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 07:56, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Deleted article == | == Deleted article == | ||
Opinion pieces are not suitable for the wiki here. Please read [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:What_Citizendium_articles_are_not] That doesn't mean the topic isn't welcome, but it has to be written up in a neutral manner. Sorry, had to delete. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 14:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT) | Opinion pieces are not suitable for the wiki here. Please read [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:What_Citizendium_articles_are_not] That doesn't mean the topic isn't welcome, but it has to be written up in a neutral manner. Sorry, had to delete. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 14:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Waldo Peirce article == | |||
Hello, I wonder if you could take a moment to look at the [[Waldo Peirce]] article and assess whether or not it's okay as it is, or if changes need to be made. Several people have suggested that it be put up for Approved status; to attain that goal, I gather, it has to be given the go-ahead by a certain number of Editors in that particular Workgroup -- which is why I'm sending you this message. Thanks! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:20, 14 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:20, 14 November 2007
[User bio is in User:Your Name]
Welcome
| Citizendium Getting Started | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians | |||
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!
You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.
Have fun and Happy editing!
--Matt Innis (Talk) 08:15, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
| Citizendium Editor Policy | ||
|---|---|---|
| The Editor Role | Approval Process | Article Deletion Policy |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started and our help system for other introductory pages. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. Announcements are also available via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon. --Larry Sanger 07:56, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
Deleted article
Opinion pieces are not suitable for the wiki here. Please read [1] That doesn't mean the topic isn't welcome, but it has to be written up in a neutral manner. Sorry, had to delete. Nancy Sculerati 14:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
Waldo Peirce article
Hello, I wonder if you could take a moment to look at the Waldo Peirce article and assess whether or not it's okay as it is, or if changes need to be made. Several people have suggested that it be put up for Approved status; to attain that goal, I gather, it has to be given the go-ahead by a certain number of Editors in that particular Workgroup -- which is why I'm sending you this message. Thanks! Hayford Peirce 11:20, 14 November 2007 (CST)