Talk:German dialects: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(changed article status to 2)
imported>Pat Palmer
Line 22: Line 22:


:I think that you should use <nowiki>{{speedydelete}}</nowiki> in this article. - [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 13:20, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
:I think that you should use <nowiki>{{speedydelete}}</nowiki> in this article. - [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 13:20, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
::I decided to go for it.  Just started the rewritten article and am trying to get it correctly "cleaned" and categorized.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 14:49, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:49, 3 April 2007


Article Checklist for "German dialects"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Pat Palmer 14:30, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Notice of intended major revision

Since this article appears to have been brought from Wikipedia (and still exists over in Wikipedia with much the same content), would anyone object if I attempt a complete rewrite (i.e., start over)?

My German sandbox page is a very rough draft (not proofed and needed much more) of what I have in mind for the rewrite. Some of the existing article's sections could become different articles in their own right if we don't want to lose that information.

One beef I have about it as it stands is that its too much like a linguistics textbook. One can go out and buy those. I think we should try to give the big picture here, and then refer people to other places for the gory details.

What do you all think? May I tackle this article? Will anyone be offended if I archive what's here and, well, start over?Pat Palmer 13:05, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

I think that you should use {{speedydelete}} in this article. - Versuri 13:20, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
I decided to go for it. Just started the rewritten article and am trying to get it correctly "cleaned" and categorized.Pat Palmer 14:49, 3 April 2007 (CDT)