Citizendium: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (some updates) |
imported>John Stephenson (updates; sections rewritten to be more readable) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{Image|Citizendium-homepage-2012-cut.png|right|400px|Citizendium home page in April 2012.}} | {{Image|Citizendium-homepage-2012-cut.png|right|400px|Citizendium home page in April 2012.}} | ||
The '''Citizendium''' (''si-tih-ZEN-dee-um'', "a [[citizen]]s' | The '''Citizendium''' (''si-tih-ZEN-dee-um'', "a [[citizen]]s' compendium") is a [[wiki]]-based free [[encyclopedia]] project founded by [[Larry Sanger]], who also co-founded [[Wikipedia]]. It allows users to write and edit articles on many subjects, as long as they register and edit under their real, verified name. The project reserves a role for recognized experts, who can approve articles as being of citable quality, but expertise is not required to join. Citizendium is governed by a directly-elected [[CZ:Council|Council]] and [[CZ:Managing Editor|Managing Editor]], and has a [[CZ:Charter|Charter]] which sets out its members rights and responsibilities. | ||
The project aims to improve on the Wikipedia model by providing reliable and high-quality content,<ref>[[CZ:Fundamentals|The Citizendium's Statement of Fundamental Policies]]. Accessed September 6, 2007.</ref> and its content was first envisioned as a complete "[[Fork (software development)|fork]]" of the English Wikipedia. However, the project abandoned that idea prior its public launch to focus its own original articles, though it allows material from other wikis to be used with attribution. Citizendium's own articles are released under a [[Creative Commons]] license that allows acknowledged duplication. | |||
Citizendium was introduced as a "beta" (in development) project on March 25, 2007. After project members voted for a new Charter in September 2010, the "beta" tag was dropped in 2011. The project currently has {{PAGESINCAT:CZ Live}} articles in varying stages of development, of which {{PAGESINCAT:Citable versions of articles}} are approved.<ref>[[:Category:Citable versions of articles|List of and links to Citable Articles]].</ref> | |||
{{TOC|left}} | {{TOC|left}} | ||
==Structure== | ==Structure== | ||
The Citizendium is run according to the articles of its [[CZ:Charter|Charter]], which establishes various executive, managerial, disciplinary and technical roles | The Citizendium is run according to the articles of its [[CZ:Charter|Charter]], which establishes various executive, managerial, disciplinary and technical roles. There is a separation of powers in effect, under which one person may not serve in more than one office at the same time. This does not apply to the Citizendium's [[CZ:Technical Team|technical staff]], who are appointed to maintain the [[software]] and [[server]]s of the wiki. | ||
Members of the project are called "Citizens". They are further divided into "Authors", who are regular project members, and "Editors", who are recognized experts with the power to approve versions of articles and take content-related decisions in their subject fields. All Editors are also Authors, in that they can contribute as non-experts to any other articles. All elected and appointed positions are open to Authors, except the role of Managing Editor, which is reserved for Editors only. | |||
===Elected offices=== | |||
The directly-elected [[CZ:Council|Citizendium Council]] is responsible for shaping the content of articles, as well as funding, appointments, and other administrative matters. One member of the Council is also the [[CZ:Managing Editor|Managing Editor]], who is elected separately to represent the project, make interim decisions and mediate disputes. | |||
===Appointed roles=== | |||
All other roles are appointed by the Council. These include: the technical staff; the [[CZ:Moderator Group|Moderator Group]], which monitors behavior and maintains order in discussions; and the Treasurer, who administers the project's finances. Other positions may be created as necessary, such as a temporary Election Committee to run ballots. All Citizens are entitled to one vote in any election. | |||
==Origin of Citizendium== | ==Origin of Citizendium== | ||
{{Image|Larry-Sanger at WOS4.jpg|right|222px|[[Larry Sanger]] announcing the ''Citizendium'' on September 15, 2006, at the Wizards of OS 4 conference, Berlin.}} | {{Image|Larry-Sanger at WOS4.jpg|right|222px|[[Larry Sanger]] announcing the ''Citizendium'' on September 15, 2006, at the Wizards of OS 4 conference, Berlin.}} | ||
[[Larry Sanger]], co-founder of Wikipedia, former | [[Larry Sanger]], co-founder of Wikipedia, former Editor-in-Chief of [[Nupedia]], and consultant to other web-encyclopedia projects such as the [[Encyclopedia of Earth]], announced the concept for Citizendium on September 15, 2006 at Berlin's [[Wizards of OS]] 4 conference. The project moved on to a pilot phase in October, and formally launched on March 25, 2007. | ||
Like Wikipedia, Citizendium is a project to prepare an encyclopedia through the collaborative writing approach known as wiki | Like Wikipedia, Citizendium is a project to prepare an encyclopedia through the collaborative writing approach known as 'wiki'.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://c2.com/doc/etymology.html|date=November 2003|title=Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki|accessdate=09-05-2007}}</ref> | ||
==Fundamental principles== | ==Fundamental principles== | ||
Line 21: | Line 31: | ||
===Open collaboration=== | ===Open collaboration=== | ||
Citizendium is similar to Wikipedia in that it is an open wiki: the public is invited to participate and edit most pages. | Citizendium is similar to Wikipedia in that it is an open wiki: the public is invited to participate and edit most pages. Anonymous edits are not allowed, but in principle members can edit most pages. | ||
===Real names=== | |||
Citizendium requires that all contributors edit under their real name, as this is thought to reduced [[vandalism]], encourage a civil atmosphere, and help readers to judge how accurate an article may be. Any applicant must not only declare that the name they have submitted is their own, but must submit evidence that verifies this. Common verification methods include use of a non-free e-mail address, such as one used at an educational institution or company, or the submission of scanned identity documents such as a driver's license (information other than the applicant's name may be blacked out). Minors are asked to provide less personal information, while applicants seeking to become Editors are required to provide more extensive evidence of their qualifications or experience. All contributors must also maintain a public biography about themselves, to give readers some idea of the knowledge or abilities the Citizen has brought to their edits. | |||
Sanger has stated that real names, in contrast to the [[pseudonym]]s common on Wikipedia, add to the credibility and accuracy of Citizendium articles. | |||
===Expert contribution=== | ===Expert contribution=== | ||
On Wikipedia and other projects, and "editor" is any user who can edit pages. On Citizendium, however, an "Editor" is a recognised expert in one or more fields. Editors are also "Authors", i.e. regular contributors to the project, but they may be able to make final decisions on content in their field of expertise, and may also approve versions of articles as "citable", i.e. of reasonably good quality. | |||
Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger promoted the shift to expertise, saying: "people who know a great deal about a subject, who are recognized by various societal mechanisms for that knowledge, can add a great of value to Web 2.0 projects, if they are given special roles that recognize their expertise."<ref>Sanger (2006) ''Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0'' Keynote delivered at SDForum, San Jose, California, Oct. 24, 2006, retrieved from [http://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html http://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html] on May 7, 2007.</ref> Using a metaphor from [[Eric S. Raymond|Eric S. Raymond's]] story about ''[[The Cathedral and the Bazaar]]'', Sanger suggested that we "Think of editors as the village elders wandering the bazaar and occasionally dispensing advice and reining in the wayward. Their presence is merely a moderating, civilizing influence. They don't stop the bazaar from being a bazaar."<ref>Sanger (2006) ''The Citizendium FAQ'', retrieved from [http://www.citizendium.org/faq.html#editors http://www.citizendium.org/faq.html#editors] on May 7, 2007.</ref> | Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger promoted the shift to expertise, saying: "people who know a great deal about a subject, who are recognized by various societal mechanisms for that knowledge, can add a great of value to Web 2.0 projects, if they are given special roles that recognize their expertise."<ref>Sanger (2006) ''Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0'' Keynote delivered at SDForum, San Jose, California, Oct. 24, 2006, retrieved from [http://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html http://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html] on May 7, 2007.</ref> Using a metaphor from [[Eric S. Raymond|Eric S. Raymond's]] story about ''[[The Cathedral and the Bazaar]]'', Sanger suggested that we "Think of editors as the village elders wandering the bazaar and occasionally dispensing advice and reining in the wayward. Their presence is merely a moderating, civilizing influence. They don't stop the bazaar from being a bazaar."<ref>Sanger (2006) ''The Citizendium FAQ'', retrieved from [http://www.citizendium.org/faq.html#editors http://www.citizendium.org/faq.html#editors] on May 7, 2007.</ref> | ||
=== | ===Citable articles=== | ||
An Editor may declare a version of an article essentially complete and of reasonably good quality. A copy of this approved version is made available, locked to further editing, on a subpage of the main article. The article itself remains freely editable and can later be re-approved and replace the citable version. | |||
=== | ===Article inclusion policy=== | ||
Citizendium | Citizendium has no equivalent of a "notability" policy, so articles on subjects which many readers might consider obscure are accepted. Instead, the project has an [[CZ:ARticle Inclusion Policy|article inclusion policy]] which sets out the reasons under which a page may be deleted or archived on content grounds. These grounds include: significant weaknesses in the material; lack of importance to the project; little chance of the material being improved due to lack of interest. | ||
==Project goals== | ==Project goals== | ||
Line 51: | Line 66: | ||
Responsibility covers a broad scope within this project. Not only do members have responsibilities to the project and its contributors, but they also are responsible for the content they produce. The project has created policy that determines it will maximize attribution, either to an author or a source. | Responsibility covers a broad scope within this project. Not only do members have responsibilities to the project and its contributors, but they also are responsible for the content they produce. The project has created policy that determines it will maximize attribution, either to an author or a source. | ||
Additionally, the Citizendium guidelines propose that | Additionally, the Citizendium guidelines propose that Editors and Authors alike have a responsibility to the public at large. It is the duty of all contributors to ensure that information on an article can be attributed to fact, and does not contain any questionable or unauthorized/copyrighted material, unless that required permission has been specifically granted for the use of the project. | ||
There is also the great importance of projecting reliable information: if Citizendium articles are not accurate then the project cannot be credible. The goal is to create a "better free encyclopedia", and its users and content should aim to fulfill that. | There is also the great importance of projecting reliable information: if Citizendium articles are not accurate then the project cannot be credible. The goal is to create a "better free encyclopedia", and its users and content should aim to fulfill that. | ||
Should there be any incident of irresponsibility or abject behavior or content, | Should there be any incident of irresponsibility or abject behavior or content, Citizendium has processes and policies in place that are able to deal with these in the most professional manner available, and those should be exercised first to prevent user conflict and infighting. | ||
==Governance== | ==Governance== | ||
The Citizendium [[CZ:Charter|Charter]] provides rules for the governance of the project within its community. Examples (as of | The Citizendium [[CZ:Charter|Charter]] provides rules for the governance of the project within its community. Examples (as of July 2016) include: | ||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 2|Article 2]]: '' | *[[CZ:Charter#Article 2|Article 2]]: ''All persons who apply for a Citizendium account shall do so under their real name and according to other criteria that may be established by the Citizendium Council. Application process shall be defined by the Citizendium Council. Participants in Citizendium agree to abide by this charter and other terms of participation as established by the Citizendium Council.'' | ||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 4|Article 4]]: ''The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.'' | *[[CZ:Charter#Article 4|Article 4]]: ''The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.'' | ||
Line 70: | Line 85: | ||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 14|Article 14]]: ''Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Citizendium Council.'' | *[[CZ:Charter#Article 14|Article 14]]: ''Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Citizendium Council.'' | ||
The combination of these guidelines result in a project that while still existing as an "open system", must have attribution, accuracy, and the unbridled freedom for subject matter experts to be a part of the project. | The combination of these guidelines result in a project that, while still existing as an "open system", must have attribution, accuracy, and the unbridled freedom for subject matter experts to be a part of the project. | ||
===Governance changes=== | ===Governance changes=== | ||
Line 76: | Line 91: | ||
Until July 2016, the Moderator Group was known as the 'Constabulary' and its members as 'Constables'. The group was [[User:ElectionJune2016/Referenda/2|renamed]] in a referendum that year. | Until July 2016, the Moderator Group was known as the 'Constabulary' and its members as 'Constables'. The group was [[User:ElectionJune2016/Referenda/2|renamed]] in a referendum that year. | ||
==Licensing== | |||
All original Citizendium content is available under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported] license. This license means that they may be altered and freely redistributed as long as the work is properly attributed and shared under the same or a similar license. | |||
Composers of text, images, and artwork in Citizendium are free to republish it elsewhere as they wish, because as authors they keep their own copyright. As Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger explains, "The Citizendium has not declared that individuals are, by contributing content, thereby transferring or in any way sharing their copyright with the Citizendium Foundation."<ref>{{cite web|last=Sanger|first=Larry|date=December 2007|title=An explanation of the ''Citizendium'' license|url=http://www.citizendium.org/czlicense.html|publisher=Citizendium|accessdate=28 November 2013}}</ref> | |||
==Reception== | ==Reception== | ||
On November 1st, 2007, Citizendium officially turned one-year old. To celebrate its birthday, Sanger produced a press release that presented a narrative snapshot of the current state of the project, in terms of its progress and to debunk some myths about its status. Also, a [[Slashdot]] post was made to mark the occasion. | On November 1st, 2007, Citizendium officially turned one-year old. To celebrate its birthday, Sanger produced a press release that presented a narrative snapshot of the current state of the project, in terms of its progress and to debunk some myths about its status. Also, a [[Slashdot]] post was made to mark the occasion. | ||
Among web sites with the highest traffic, as of | Among web sites with the highest traffic, as of July 2016 Citizendium was [http://scripts.ranking.com/data/details.aspx?theurl=citizendium.org ranked around 72,000] by [http://www.ranking.com/ Ranking.com], a drop since mid-May 2011 from an earlier level of about 10,000-12,000. According to [[Alexa Internet|Alexa]], [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/citizendium.org Citizendium's main audience demographic] is mainly male and with a college education. | ||
==Criticism== | ===Criticism=== | ||
Objections to the Citizendium have been raised by journalists, bloggers and members of other wikis, particularly some Wikipedians. One early criticism focused on the wiki's guidance role for experts: the Citizendium cannot succeed because there is no such thing as an expert outside those institutions that specifically certify an individual as an expert; who is an "expert" depends on context.<ref>''Many2Many'': '[http://many.corante.com/archives/2006/09/18/larry_sanger_citizendium_and_the_problem_of_expertise.php Larry Sanger, Citizendium and the Problem of Expertise]'. Blog post by Clay Shirky, September 18 2006.</ref> | Objections to the Citizendium have been raised by journalists, bloggers and members of other wikis, particularly some Wikipedians. One early criticism focused on the wiki's guidance role for experts: the Citizendium cannot succeed because there is no such thing as an expert outside those institutions that specifically certify an individual as an expert; who is an "expert" depends on context.<ref>''Many2Many'': '[http://many.corante.com/archives/2006/09/18/larry_sanger_citizendium_and_the_problem_of_expertise.php Larry Sanger, Citizendium and the Problem of Expertise]'. Blog post by Clay Shirky, September 18 2006.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 1 July 2016
The Citizendium (si-tih-ZEN-dee-um, "a citizens' compendium") is a wiki-based free encyclopedia project founded by Larry Sanger, who also co-founded Wikipedia. It allows users to write and edit articles on many subjects, as long as they register and edit under their real, verified name. The project reserves a role for recognized experts, who can approve articles as being of citable quality, but expertise is not required to join. Citizendium is governed by a directly-elected Council and Managing Editor, and has a Charter which sets out its members rights and responsibilities.
The project aims to improve on the Wikipedia model by providing reliable and high-quality content,[1] and its content was first envisioned as a complete "fork" of the English Wikipedia. However, the project abandoned that idea prior its public launch to focus its own original articles, though it allows material from other wikis to be used with attribution. Citizendium's own articles are released under a Creative Commons license that allows acknowledged duplication.
Citizendium was introduced as a "beta" (in development) project on March 25, 2007. After project members voted for a new Charter in September 2010, the "beta" tag was dropped in 2011. The project currently has 16,469 articles in varying stages of development, of which 146 are approved.[2]
Structure
The Citizendium is run according to the articles of its Charter, which establishes various executive, managerial, disciplinary and technical roles. There is a separation of powers in effect, under which one person may not serve in more than one office at the same time. This does not apply to the Citizendium's technical staff, who are appointed to maintain the software and servers of the wiki.
Members of the project are called "Citizens". They are further divided into "Authors", who are regular project members, and "Editors", who are recognized experts with the power to approve versions of articles and take content-related decisions in their subject fields. All Editors are also Authors, in that they can contribute as non-experts to any other articles. All elected and appointed positions are open to Authors, except the role of Managing Editor, which is reserved for Editors only.
Elected offices
The directly-elected Citizendium Council is responsible for shaping the content of articles, as well as funding, appointments, and other administrative matters. One member of the Council is also the Managing Editor, who is elected separately to represent the project, make interim decisions and mediate disputes.
Appointed roles
All other roles are appointed by the Council. These include: the technical staff; the Moderator Group, which monitors behavior and maintains order in discussions; and the Treasurer, who administers the project's finances. Other positions may be created as necessary, such as a temporary Election Committee to run ballots. All Citizens are entitled to one vote in any election.
Origin of Citizendium
Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, former Editor-in-Chief of Nupedia, and consultant to other web-encyclopedia projects such as the Encyclopedia of Earth, announced the concept for Citizendium on September 15, 2006 at Berlin's Wizards of OS 4 conference. The project moved on to a pilot phase in October, and formally launched on March 25, 2007.
Like Wikipedia, Citizendium is a project to prepare an encyclopedia through the collaborative writing approach known as 'wiki'.[3]
Fundamental principles
Citizendium was founded on the following organizational principles that, for the most part, distinguish it from Wikipedia. These principles are maintained by the Charter, which superseded the original 'Statement of Fundamental Policies' in September 2010.
Open collaboration
Citizendium is similar to Wikipedia in that it is an open wiki: the public is invited to participate and edit most pages. Anonymous edits are not allowed, but in principle members can edit most pages.
Real names
Citizendium requires that all contributors edit under their real name, as this is thought to reduced vandalism, encourage a civil atmosphere, and help readers to judge how accurate an article may be. Any applicant must not only declare that the name they have submitted is their own, but must submit evidence that verifies this. Common verification methods include use of a non-free e-mail address, such as one used at an educational institution or company, or the submission of scanned identity documents such as a driver's license (information other than the applicant's name may be blacked out). Minors are asked to provide less personal information, while applicants seeking to become Editors are required to provide more extensive evidence of their qualifications or experience. All contributors must also maintain a public biography about themselves, to give readers some idea of the knowledge or abilities the Citizen has brought to their edits.
Sanger has stated that real names, in contrast to the pseudonyms common on Wikipedia, add to the credibility and accuracy of Citizendium articles.
Expert contribution
On Wikipedia and other projects, and "editor" is any user who can edit pages. On Citizendium, however, an "Editor" is a recognised expert in one or more fields. Editors are also "Authors", i.e. regular contributors to the project, but they may be able to make final decisions on content in their field of expertise, and may also approve versions of articles as "citable", i.e. of reasonably good quality.
Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger promoted the shift to expertise, saying: "people who know a great deal about a subject, who are recognized by various societal mechanisms for that knowledge, can add a great of value to Web 2.0 projects, if they are given special roles that recognize their expertise."[4] Using a metaphor from Eric S. Raymond's story about The Cathedral and the Bazaar, Sanger suggested that we "Think of editors as the village elders wandering the bazaar and occasionally dispensing advice and reining in the wayward. Their presence is merely a moderating, civilizing influence. They don't stop the bazaar from being a bazaar."[5]
Citable articles
An Editor may declare a version of an article essentially complete and of reasonably good quality. A copy of this approved version is made available, locked to further editing, on a subpage of the main article. The article itself remains freely editable and can later be re-approved and replace the citable version.
Article inclusion policy
Citizendium has no equivalent of a "notability" policy, so articles on subjects which many readers might consider obscure are accepted. Instead, the project has an article inclusion policy which sets out the reasons under which a page may be deleted or archived on content grounds. These grounds include: significant weaknesses in the material; lack of importance to the project; little chance of the material being improved due to lack of interest.
Project goals
Neutrality
Citizendium adopted a Neutrality Policy[6] that was based on an early version of Wikipedia's neutrality policy (circa December 2001), which had been drafted by Sanger. The Citizendium policy was subsequently subjected to the Charter (as of April 2012):
- Article 4: The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.
- Article 18: The Citizendium shall welcome contributions in all fields of knowledge.
- Article 19: All articles shall treat their subjects comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively to the greatest degree possible in a well-written narrative, complementing text with other suitable material and media.
- Article 23: The Citizendium shall remain free of advocacy, advertisement and sensationalism.
Responsibility
Responsibility covers a broad scope within this project. Not only do members have responsibilities to the project and its contributors, but they also are responsible for the content they produce. The project has created policy that determines it will maximize attribution, either to an author or a source.
Additionally, the Citizendium guidelines propose that Editors and Authors alike have a responsibility to the public at large. It is the duty of all contributors to ensure that information on an article can be attributed to fact, and does not contain any questionable or unauthorized/copyrighted material, unless that required permission has been specifically granted for the use of the project.
There is also the great importance of projecting reliable information: if Citizendium articles are not accurate then the project cannot be credible. The goal is to create a "better free encyclopedia", and its users and content should aim to fulfill that.
Should there be any incident of irresponsibility or abject behavior or content, Citizendium has processes and policies in place that are able to deal with these in the most professional manner available, and those should be exercised first to prevent user conflict and infighting.
Governance
The Citizendium Charter provides rules for the governance of the project within its community. Examples (as of July 2016) include:
- Article 2: All persons who apply for a Citizendium account shall do so under their real name and according to other criteria that may be established by the Citizendium Council. Application process shall be defined by the Citizendium Council. Participants in Citizendium agree to abide by this charter and other terms of participation as established by the Citizendium Council.
- Article 4: The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.
- Article 5: Citizens shall act responsibly and in a civil manner: derogatory or offensive language or behavior will not be tolerated...
- Article 11: Citizens should expect Officers and Editors to be fair and impartial. Biased Officers and Editors shall recuse themselves from their official positions in any dispute resolution process.
- Article 14: Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Citizendium Council.
The combination of these guidelines result in a project that, while still existing as an "open system", must have attribution, accuracy, and the unbridled freedom for subject matter experts to be a part of the project.
Governance changes
Originally, executive decisions were the responsibility of the then-Editor-in-Chief, Larry Sanger, who also founded the project. Governance subsequently became a matter for the first Editorial Council, which in turn was replaced by separate Management and Editorial Councils established through the ratification of the Charter. These were merged into a single Citizendium Council in 2013. The role of Ombudsman, originally empowered by the Charter to mediate disputes, was abolished in 2014 and its duties merged with those of the Managing Editor. Over time, the number of elected positions has fallen, from 33 in the original Editorial Council, to 14 through the first version of the Charter, and 4 as of July 2014.
Until July 2016, the Moderator Group was known as the 'Constabulary' and its members as 'Constables'. The group was renamed in a referendum that year.
Licensing
All original Citizendium content is available under the Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. This license means that they may be altered and freely redistributed as long as the work is properly attributed and shared under the same or a similar license.
Composers of text, images, and artwork in Citizendium are free to republish it elsewhere as they wish, because as authors they keep their own copyright. As Founding Editor-in-Chief Larry Sanger explains, "The Citizendium has not declared that individuals are, by contributing content, thereby transferring or in any way sharing their copyright with the Citizendium Foundation."[7]
Reception
On November 1st, 2007, Citizendium officially turned one-year old. To celebrate its birthday, Sanger produced a press release that presented a narrative snapshot of the current state of the project, in terms of its progress and to debunk some myths about its status. Also, a Slashdot post was made to mark the occasion.
Among web sites with the highest traffic, as of July 2016 Citizendium was ranked around 72,000 by Ranking.com, a drop since mid-May 2011 from an earlier level of about 10,000-12,000. According to Alexa, Citizendium's main audience demographic is mainly male and with a college education.
Criticism
Objections to the Citizendium have been raised by journalists, bloggers and members of other wikis, particularly some Wikipedians. One early criticism focused on the wiki's guidance role for experts: the Citizendium cannot succeed because there is no such thing as an expert outside those institutions that specifically certify an individual as an expert; who is an "expert" depends on context.[8]
A common complaint is that the fledgeling Citizendium is too small to compete with bigger websites;[9] The strength of this argument would be diluted as the Citizendium gathered a larger contributor base over time and produced more articles.
Footnotes
- ↑ The Citizendium's Statement of Fundamental Policies. Accessed September 6, 2007.
- ↑ List of and links to Citable Articles.
- ↑ Correspondence on the Etymology of Wiki (November 2003). Retrieved on 09-05-2007.
- ↑ Sanger (2006) Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0 Keynote delivered at SDForum, San Jose, California, Oct. 24, 2006, retrieved from http://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html on May 7, 2007.
- ↑ Sanger (2006) The Citizendium FAQ, retrieved from http://www.citizendium.org/faq.html#editors on May 7, 2007.
- ↑ Neutrality Policy (09-05-2007). Retrieved on 09-05-2007.
- ↑ Sanger, Larry (December 2007). An explanation of the Citizendium license. Citizendium. Retrieved on 28 November 2013.
- ↑ Many2Many: 'Larry Sanger, Citizendium and the Problem of Expertise'. Blog post by Clay Shirky, September 18 2006.
- ↑ For example, see dot.life: 'Will Wikipedia always win?'. BBC blog post by Rory Cellan-Jones, March 31 2008.