Talk:Cleromancy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
This article assumes that the | This article assumes that the | ||
Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing | Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST) | That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 26 September 2007
This article assumes that the Urim and Tummim the high priest carried in his clothing were stones. Is this considered generally accepted? DavidGoodman 00:29, 22 November 2006 (CST)
That's what Halliday says, but from what we know no one can tell for sure. They may have been pieces of bone or some other material. We can circumvent using the word "stones", add a qualification or simply avoid the noun "stones.' Ori Redler 10:31, 22 November 2006 (CST)