Larkin Reynolds: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Lawfare" to "Lawfare<ref>Wikipedia has an article about Lawfare.<ref>") |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) (removing redlink; also, either italics or quotes around title, but not both) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br> | |||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{Infobox Person | {{Infobox Person | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
| footnotes = | | footnotes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Larkin Reynolds''' is an [[United States of America|American]] lawyer and counterterrorism specialist.<ref name=LawfareLarkin/><ref name=WilmerHaleLarkin/> Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard, Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.<ref name=Chronicla2010-06-20/> While a student, Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School, Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale. | '''Larkin Reynolds''' is an [[United States of America|American]] lawyer and counterterrorism specialist.<ref name=LawfareLarkin /><ref name=WilmerHaleLarkin/> Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard, Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.<ref name=Chronicla2010-06-20/> While a student, Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School, Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale. | ||
In May 2011 Reynolds was a co-author of a paper entitled '' | In May 2011 Reynolds was a co-author of a paper entitled ''The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking'', that argued that Judges were being forced to '''make''' the law, since the laws on fighting counterterrorism, and, specifically, the laws on the legality of detaining suspects indefinitely, without charge, were poorly defined.<ref name=brookings2011-05-12/> | ||
==Education== | ==Education== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
| 2010 || [[J.D.]] || [[Harvard Law School]] || Law degree | | 2010 || [[J.D.]] || [[Harvard Law School]] || Law degree | ||
|} | |} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|refs= | {{reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name=WilmerHaleLarkin> | <ref name=WilmerHaleLarkin> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| Line 102: | Line 105: | ||
| url = http://www.lawfareblog.com/author/larkin/ | | url = http://www.lawfareblog.com/author/larkin/ | ||
| title = Posts by Larkin Reynolds | | title = Posts by Larkin Reynolds | ||
| work = Lawfare | | work = Lawfare | ||
| author = | | author = | ||
| date = | | date = | ||
| Line 117: | Line 120: | ||
}} | }} | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 19 June 2024
| This article may be deleted soon. | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Larkin Reynolds is an American lawyer and counterterrorism specialist.[1][2] Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard, Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.[3] While a student, Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School, Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale. In May 2011 Reynolds was a co-author of a paper entitled The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking, that argued that Judges were being forced to make the law, since the laws on fighting counterterrorism, and, specifically, the laws on the legality of detaining suspects indefinitely, without charge, were poorly defined.[4] Education
References
|
||||||||||||||||||
