User talk:Paul Wormer/Scratchbook

Is this to be a subsection of the Global Warming article?

I have some purely editing suggestions, but some may be easier to see once this is merged with the article, if that's your intent. Is the anthropogenic term clearly defined in the main article? I'd suggest, if not, that it be there, and bolded. The arguments for and against (I am no expert in the subject0 could be delineated by subheadings.

For the bulleted links at the end, if you aren't already planning to do so, you might put some text with what would become inline citations, so the reader sees a bulleted summary of his arguments, but the citations collect under the references for the article.

Howard C. Berkowitz 14:25, 17 August 2008 (CDT)

I intend to do more work on it (hidden away, I hoped, in my scratchbook). Because it is a sensitive subject I plan to leave the main article intact, and to add only a section that reflects the opinion of climate change sceptics (which are not necessarily my own; I don't have a very set opinion about climate change, I've lots of doubts either way). The article may still change, but, after I've inserted my contribution into the main article, I appreciate any input, both textual and contential (if that's a word).--Paul Wormer 01:39, 18 August 2008 (CDT)

If you don't like the change, go to the history tab. Find the version below my changes. Click on it, save, and you will have it, unchanged.