Relative volatility/Citable Version

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
This version approved either by the Approvals Committee, or an Editor from at least one of the listed workgroups. The Engineering and Chemistry Workgroups are responsible for this citable version. While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this version is wholly free of mistakes. See here (not History) for authorship.
Help improve this work further on the editable Main Article!

Relative volatility is a measure that compares the vapor pressures of the components in a liquid mixture of chemicals. This measure is widely used in designing large industrial distillation processes.[1][2][3] In effect, it indicates the ease or difficulty of using distillation to separate the more volatile components from the less volatile components in a mixture. By convention, relative volatility is typically denoted as .

Relative volatilities are used in the design of all types of distillation processes as well as other separation or absorption processes that involve the contacting of vapor and liquid phases in a series of equilibrium stages.

Relative volatilities are not used in separation or absorption processes that involve components that chemically react with each other (for example, the absorption of gaseous carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of sodium hydroxide which yields sodium carbonate).

Relative volatility of binary liquid mixtures

(PD) Image: MiltonBeychok
Schematic diagram of a large-scale binary distillation column.

For a liquid mixture of two components (called a binary mixture) at a given temperature and pressure, the relative volatility is defined as

= the relative volatility of the more volatile component to the less volatile component
= the vapor-liquid equilibrium concentration of component in the vapor phase
= the vapor-liquid equilibrium concentration of component in the liquid phase
= the vapor-liquid equilibrium concentration of component in the vapor phase
= the vapor-liquid equilibrium concentration of component in the liquid phase
=   commonly called the K value or vapor-liquid distribution ratio of a component

When their liquid concentrations are equal, more volatile components have higher vapor pressures than less volatile components. Thus, a value (= ) for a more volatile component is larger than a value for a less volatile component. That means that ≥ 1 since the larger value of the more volatile component is in the numerator and the smaller of the less volatile component is in the denominator.

The quantity is unitless. When the volatilities of both key components are equal, it follows that = 1 and separation of the two by distillation would be impossible under the given conditions. As the value of increases above 1, separation by distillation becomes progressively easier.

When a binary liquid mixture is distilled, complete separation of the two components is rarely achieved. Typically, the overhead fraction from the distillation column consists predominantly of the more volatile component and some small amount of the less volatile component and the bottoms fraction consists predominantly of the less volatile component and some small amount of the more volatile component.

Relative volatility of multi-component mixtures

A liquid mixture containing many components is called a multi-component mixture. When a multi-component mixture is is distilled, the overhead fraction and the bottoms fraction typically contain much more than one or two components. For example, some intermediate products in a petroleum refinery are multi-component liquid mixtures that may contain the alkane, alkene and alkyne hydrocarbons ranging from methane having one carbon atom to decanes having ten carbon atoms. For distilling such a mixture, the distillation column may be designed (for example) to produce:

  • An overhead fraction containing predominantly the more volatile components ranging from methane (having one carbon atom) to propane (having three carbon atoms)
  • A bottoms fraction containing predominantly the less volatile components ranging from isobutane (having four carbon atoms) to decanes (ten carbon atoms).

Such a distillation column is typically called a depropanizer. The column designer would designate the key components governing the separation design to be propane as the so-called light key (LK) and isobutane as the so-called heavy key (HK). In that context, a lighter component means a component with a lower boiling point (or a higher vapor pressure) and a heavier component means a component with a higher boiling point (or a lower vapor pressure).

Thus, for the distillation of any multi-component mixture, the relative volatility is often defined as

Large-scale industrial distillation is rarely undertaken if the relative volatility is less than 1.05.[2]

The values of have been correlated empirically or theoretically in terms of temperature, pressure and phase compositions in the form of equations, tables or graph such as the well-known DePriester charts.[4][5]

values are widely used in the design of large-scale distillation columns for distilling multi-component mixtures in petroleum refineries, petrochemical and chemical plants, natural gas processing plants and other industries.

Effect of temperature or pressure on relative volatility

An increase in pressure has a significant effect on the relative volatility of the components in a liquid mixture. Since an increase in the pressure requires an increase in the temperature, then an increase in temperature also effects the relative volatility.

The diagram below is based on the vapor-liquid equilibrium of a hypothetical binary liquid mixture and illustrates how an increase in either the pressure or temperature decreases the relative volatility of the mixture.

(PD) Image: Milton Beychok


  1. Kister, Henry Z. (1992). Distillation Design, 1st Edition. McGraw-hill. ISBN 0-07-034909-6. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 Perry, R.H. and Green, D.W. (Editors) (1984). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 6th Edition. McGraw-hill. ISBN 0-07-049479-7. 
  3. Seader, J. D., and Henley, Ernest J. (1998). Separation Process Principles. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-58626-9. 
  4. DePriester, C.L. (1953), Chem. Eng. Prog. Symposium Series, 7, 49, pages 1-43
  5. DePriester Charts