Frederick Twort/Citable Version

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
This version approved either by the Approvals Committee, or an Editor from at least one of the listed workgroups. The Biology and History Workgroups are responsible for this citable version. While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this version is wholly free of mistakes. See here (not History) for authorship.
Help improve this work further on the editable Main Article!

Frederick William Twort (1877-1950) was an English bacteriologist who discovered in bacteriophages, the viruses that attack and destroy bacteria. Twort spent much of his career as superintendent of the Brown Institution, and made several important discoveries regarding the growth of bacteria on artificial media.

Frederick Twort

Early Life and Scientific Training

The eldest of the eleven children of Dr. William Henry Twort, Frederick Twort was born in Camberley, Surrey on 22 October 1877. [1] Little is known of his youth, except that he studied medicine at St Thomas's Hospital, London. After qualifing in medicine (Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons, Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians) in 1900, Twort took the first paid post available, assistant to Dr. Louis Jenner, Superintendent of the Clinical Laboratory of St Thomas' Hospital. There he trained in pathological techniques. In 1902 he became assistant to the Bacteriologist of the London Hospital, Dr. William Bulloch, later F.R.S., and carried out single-handed the whole diagnostic routine of the Hospital. In 1909, Twort became the superintendent of the Brown Institution, a pathology research centre, and remained there for the duration of his career. In 1919 Twort married Dorothy Nony, daughter of Frederick J. Banister, and together they had three daughters and a son.

Major Work


Early in the history of microbiology, bacteria were often differentiated testing their ability to grow on different media. Twort's first important paper [2] found some shortcomings to this method. He found that the major subgroups identified by sugar fermentation were not capable of clear-cut subdivision by tests on glucosides, nor even were they strictly separable by sugars. Twort wrote, "It seems, therefore, probable that the separate micro-organisms in the various subgroups are not to be regarded as distinct species, but as varieties or hybrids of one or more species. If this be so, one might expect them to be constantly varying, losing old characters and gaining new ones according to the conditions under which they are grown, and it was with the object of testing this hypothesis that further series of experiments were undertaken." Following prolonged incubation in media that they previously failed to ferment, several species acquired fermentation powers which originally they did not enjoy. We now know that these mutant individuals able to ferment novel sugars arose in culture, and came to dominate the population. Although ignored at the time (a trend that seemed to plague his career), this work was quite prescient, and anticipated, by decades, the subsequent work on adaptation and mutation by bacterial chemists and microbiologists.

Growth Factors

Leprosy was still a major concern during the early part of the 20th century. However, work on leprosy was frustrated by the inability to culture the leprosy bacillus in the laboratory. Twort suspected that the leprosy bacillus had a 'close relationship' with the tubercle bacillus, a species that was culturable. Twort wrote, "It appeared highly probable that these two organisms would require the same chemical substances for building up their protoplasm, which could be elaborated from the ordinary media only by the tubercle bacillus."[3] Twort therefore incorporated dead tubercle bacilli in the growth medium and succeeded in culturing leprosy. The essential substance supplied by the tubercle bacillus that was missing from the media turned out to be vitamin K. What is important is his demonstration that an organism can grow only when supplied with a substance elaborated by another. This, of course, is the essential feature of all growth factor work and the basis of all studies of bacterial nutrition. However, this work, too, was ignored for several decades.

Johne's disease

Twort also researched Johne's disease, a chronic intestinal infection of cattle. Similarly to leprosy, Johne's bacillus could not be cultivated on ordinary media. Incorporation of dead tubercle bacilli in the medium was successful. Johne's bacillus had been cultivated for the first time.[4] Contrary to previous efforts, Twort's work was recognized immediately.

The Twort-d'Herelle Phenomenon

Twort and his brother, Dr. C. C. Twort, had for some years been trying to grow viruses in artificial media hoping to find a nonpathogenic virus, which might be the wild type of a pathogenic and so more likely to grow. In 1914, Twort set out to identify the elusive (now known to be nonexistent) "essential substance" that would allow vaccinia virus to grow in vitro. At the time, smallpox vaccines had to be made in the skin of calves and was almost always contaminated with the bacteria Staphylococcus. Twort speculated that the contaminating bacteria might be the source of the "essential substance" needed by vaccinia to survive. He plated some of the smallpox vaccines on nutrient agar slants and obtained large bacterial colonies of several colours. Upon closer examination of the colonies with a magnifying glass, he found minute glassy areas that would not grow when subcultured. He quickly realized that these glassy areas were the result of the destruction of the bacterial cells and was able to pick from some of these areas and transmit this from one staph colony to another.

Further experiments showed that the agent could pass through porcelain filters and that it required bacteria for growth. These observations show that Twort had discovered most of the essential features of bacteriophages, although Twort seemed to favor the idea that the principle was not a separate form of life, but an enzyme which is secreted by the bacteria itself. Twort published these results in the Lancet in 1915 and called the contagion the bacteriolytic agent.[5] Unfortunately, his discovery was ignored; Felix d'Herelle discovered phage independently, and Twort's work may have been lost to time, but for Jules Bordet and Andre Gratia's rediscovery of Twort's paper.

The Great War

In the middle of his work, war broke out and a grant from the Local Government Board came to an end. Further, he became interested in the Royal Army Medical Corps and actually left for Salonika, where he was in charge of the base laboratory, a few weeks after his phage paper was published. Supposedly after that point, Twort was inundated with routine and could no longer pursue his research. To explain why he did not continue his work on bacteriophages, Twort responded, "it was sometime after the end of the war before I was really free again to continue the investigation, but at that time most of the additional details of the phenomenon had been published by other workers under the title of 'the bacteriophage'. So I passed on to other work." [6] This excuse is rather puzzling since, in 1919, bacteriophage research was still in its infancy.

Post-war Work

Following the war, the recently formed Medical Research Committee (Council) supplemented his salary as a University Professor by an annual grant of very considerable dimensions. Twort went back to expanding his original idea that the bacteriolytic agents themselves needed an addition (essential) factor of a more exceptional nature to satisfy their fundamental needs. He searched for a substance that would allow viruses to grow apart from other forms of life (i.e. a host organism) and when this was unsuccessful, he tried to prove that bacteria evolved from viruses. His prime idea was to devise conditions for the cultivation of viruses from abiotic precursors or hypothetical pre-virus forms which might exist in nature. These experiments, while failures, presaged the famous Miller-Urey experiments of the 1950s. Although he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1929, Twort was never again to publish work of any serious import.

Financial support for his research dwindled, his stipend from the MRC ended in 1936, and his laboratory was destroyed by a bomb in 1944. The University of London took this opportunity to deprive Twort of his post and research facilities. He retired to live in at Camberly and by 1949 his work was largely forgotten. Twort died on 30 March 1950.


  1. | Fildes, P. 1951. Frederick William Twort. 1877-1950 Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society 7: 504-517.
  2. Twort, F. 1907. The fermentation of glucosides by bacteria of the typhoid-coli group and the acquisition of new fermenting powers by Bacillus dysenteriae and other microorganisms. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 79: 5329
  3. Twort, F. 1910. A method for isolating and growing the lepra bacillus of man. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 83:156
  4. Twort, F. & Ingram, G.L.Y. 1912. A method for isolating and cultivating the Mycobacterium enteritidis chronicae pseudotuberculosae bovis, Johne, etc. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 84:517
  5. Twort, F. 1915. An investigation on the nature of ultramicroscopic viruses. Lancet 11: 1241
  6. Twort, F. 1930. Filter passing transmissible bacteriolytic agents (bacteriophage). Lancet 11:1064