Emergency Committee for Israel
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
The Emergency Committee for Israel (ECI) defines its mission as "mounting an active defense of the US-Israel relationship by educating the public about the positions of political candidates on this important issue, and by keeping the public informed of the latest developments in both countries." [1] Formed in July 2010 as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit political organization, [2] it unites "The hawkish, neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of whom are Jewish, and conservative Evangelical Christians who have become increasingly outspoken in their support for Israel." The group obtained media attention even before its website was live. CNN's Campbell Brown, who is the spouse of Daniel Senor, had ECI's executive director as a guest Noah Pollak of Commentary (magazine)|Commentary, to appear on her show before its website was online. [3] LinkagesIts founding Board of Directors consists of William Kristol, Gary Bauer, and Rachel Abrams. Kristol is often considered the dean of neoconservatism|neoconservatives. Bauer is a Christian Zionism|Christian Zionist. Abrams is the writer-blogger spouse of Elliott Abrams and daughter of Midge Decter and Norman Podhoretz.[4] Matthew Duss, a research associate at the Center for American Progress, reported that the group's offices have been used by other neoconservative organizations, and are also the address of Randy Scheunemann's public relations firm. Scheunemann, a Republican consultant, is the foreign policy trainer to Sarah Palin, ran the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, was the staff director for the Project for the New American Century, and an ally of Ahmed Chalabi. Michael Goldfarb, who works for Scheunemann, is an adviser to the Emergency Committee, and also to another group co-founded by Kristol and Liz Cheney, Keep America Safe.[5] Duss quoted Goldfarb as saying that the Committee had no position on the two-state solution, which has been opposed by board member Gary Bauer:David Frum speaks of its executive director, Noah Pollak, as an immensely talented communicator for Israel, who proposed that the Israeli Defense Forces introduce a YouTube channel, during the 2009 Gaza conflict, to correct propaganda of the other side.[7] Answering questions from the Jerusalem Post, Pollak contrasted ECI with J Street.
2010 campaignTheir first target is the Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania (U.S. state)|Pennsylvania, Joe Sestak, as part of broader criticism of Obama Administration Mideast policy. They have accused Sestak of "appearing at a fundraiser for the Council on American Islamic Relations, which it describes as an “anti-Israel organization the FBI called a ‘front group for Hamas.’” " and endorsing a letter against the Israeli blockade of Gaza. [9] Denying the allegations, the Sestak campaign has sent a cease-and-desist latter to Comcast, which carries the ad. [10] David Frum described this action as indicative of an overall "...coming shift in the American Jewish community. While most American Jews vote Democrat, those Jews most passionately involved with Israel have felt ever-increasing mistrust of Barack Obama, his administration and his party." [11] Identified with the left wing of American-Israeli relations, M.J. Rosenberg, Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at MediaMatters|Media Matters, who formerly worked for the Israel Policy Forum, wrote that the "ad could very easily stir up anti-Semitism because it suggests, rather powerfully, that American Jews care not about America but only about Israel. " He interpreted Kristol's statement that Emergency Committee is "the pro-Israel wing of the pro-Israel community." "By that, he means that unlike AIPAC, which at least invokes US security, the Emergency Committee is only about Israel."[12] The Jewish Telegraph Agency reports that the race is taking on national significance, as it explores whether candidates can successfully ally themselves with less hard-line groups such as J Street. Believing that it is too dangerous to alienate groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, "dovish" congressman have refused J Street support, such as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), "a Jewish lawmaker who took J Street's money in 2008 but is not on their roster of 61 endorsees this year." Jeremy Ben Ami, J Street's executive director, said "There's no question that this race is a very important test of what kind of support J Street and its supporters can deliver/ We will show a substantial amount of money can be raised from our political action committee, and that a substantial amount of money can be raised for a candidate that opposes the right wing on these issues." [13] Kristol has suggested that ECI is challenging, as well as J Street on the left, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), usually thought to be on the right, but not far-right, of U.S.-Israel positions. "There are some who say they’re pro-Israel but aren’t really ... then there’s AIPAC, which is a wonderful organization, but one that’s very committed to working with the administration, so they pull some punches publicly. Jewish Week also quoted Bauer on J Street: "You have to take a group and look at what it does. In my view, you have to come up with a pretty bizarre definition of ‘pro-Israel’ to fit J Street into that category.”[14] Kristol's criticism of working with the Administration reflects other comments that wonder to what extent ECI is concerned with Republican interests. Legal issues of foreign representationW. Patrick Lang asked, on his blog, "Why is this new outfit not a candidate for registration under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act)? It advocates partuiular American foreign policy positions on behalf of foreign country and seeks to directly pressure legislators to adopt positions favorable to that foreign power.[15] In a followup the next day, he asked "Have you registered as foreign agents, under the Foreign Agents Registration Act? This seems to be one of the most cut and dried cases of mandatory registration. They are openly advertising that they are serving as a lobby for Israel. And, by the way, as a string of law suits against American Israel Public Affairs Committee|AIPAC, and an Federal Election Commission|FEC ruling against Anti-Defamation League|ADL make clear, foreign agents, whether individuals or organizations, cannot interfere, in any way, in U.S. electoral affairs."[16] References
|