User talk:Roger A. Lohmann/Archive 3
User bio is in User:Roger_A._Lohmann
TSCF article updated
Dear Roger, I just made small updates to the article on The Social Capital Foundation, corrected links. Could you please approve the new version. Thanks. Koen Demol 19:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roger, I am looking forward to having your return. Koen Demol 16:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Roger, I am looking forward to having your return. Koen Demol 10:55, 2 May 2011 (CDT)
New politics author
Roger, we have just been joined by Levan Ramishvili of Georgia as a new politics author. You may wish to post a welcome message on his Talk page. Milton Beychok 03:43, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
History editor input needed
There is a complex controversy over appropriate terminology and neutrality policy starting in the article on Josef Mengele and spilling over to War crime and perhaps other places I am not aware of. Input from history editors might be helpful. Sandy Harris 03:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- There seems to be a lack of current information here.
- Just to clarify, so there’s no misunderstanding or hard feeling, this issue is above editor input level.
- This matter has gone to the ME and the Ombudsman, and is currently before the EC as Case http://locke.citizendium.org/cz_ec/DR-2010-001.
- I believe that due to the time zone difference, the EC Secretary will have retired already, which is the reason I’m commenting.
- I am sure the EC will contact Dr Lohmann officially should his input be needed.
- Aleta Curry 05:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am not sure, but the accused in this matter may well contact experts, and no Charter or EC rule prevents discussion. Howard C. Berkowitz 05:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Editorial guidance for WikiLeaks
Dear Roger,
would you be available to guide content development at the WikiLeaks article? Just as in the section above, this case involves Howard and Martin, who are both Editors on the article, but far from an agreement on how its content should be structured, weighed, phrased and sourced. As a Politics Editors, I think you would be well positioned to handle that matter. Thank you! --Daniel Mietchen 15:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
A comment here was deleted by The Constabulary on grounds of making complaints about fellow Citizens. If you have a complaint about the behavior of another Citizen, e-mail constables@citizendium.org. It is contrary to Citizendium policy to air your complaints on the wiki. See also CZ:Professionalism.
- Note: I didn't write the comment but I did see its contents and I concur completely with its deletion from my page! Roger A. Lohmann 13:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Editorial guidance for Politics
I am no longer seeking approval for this article because I accept Martin Baldwin-Edwards' points about matters that should be added (see Talk:Politics#Towards approval). But I should be glad of a ruling on the point made by Sandy Harris - and for any advice that you can offer.Nick Gardner 09:45, 7 May 2011 (CDT)
Please review Los Alamos National Laboratory for consideration as an Approved article
Roger, would you please review Los Alamos National Laboratory and see if it is ready to be nominated for Approval? Thanks in advance, Milton Beychok 00:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Please review Politics for consideration as an approved article
I have done what I can to prepare Politics for approval and I have created a new article on the History of political thought to meet the need for an historical context. Is there anything further that should be done? Nick Gardner 09:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Re re-approval of Cypherpunk Feb-Mar 2012
Roger: I am planning to nominate Cypherpunk/Draft for re-approval. Will you take a look at it and let me know if I can include your name as supporting the nomination.
I will allow two weeks for comments before we need to certify for approval. Thanks. --Anthony.Sebastian 03:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)