User talk:Joe Quick/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
imported>Chunbum Park (→Thank you: new section) |
imported>Joe Quick m (→Thank you) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Today the [[Dokdo]] article will be approved. Thank you for all the efforts you put in. The article is in so much better shape now. I can compare the two and see so much positive difference. If you hadn't come in to check on the article, I wouldn't have checked on it either and several key flaws would have remained on the article upon approval. Thank you again. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 11:00, 21 July 2008 (CDT)) | Today the [[Dokdo]] article will be approved. Thank you for all the efforts you put in. The article is in so much better shape now. I can compare the two and see so much positive difference. If you hadn't come in to check on the article, I wouldn't have checked on it either and several key flaws would have remained on the article upon approval. Thank you again. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 11:00, 21 July 2008 (CDT)) | ||
:You're welcome. If our collaboration helped to make the article better, then the Citizendium system is clearly working. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 09:39, 22 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:39, 22 July 2008
Hover
I'll have to find out how to transclude the definition page, but I'll look at it later. --Robert W King 15:57, 12 April 2008 (CDT)
- Can you show me a page that has a def link in context? --Robert W King 16:42, 12 April 2008 (CDT)
- On the related articles page, the definition is already transcluded from the template:def page, so I'm not sure I understand what you want to have happen that wouldn't be redundant. --Robert W King 06:45, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
Thanks!
From me, Aleta Curry 03:00, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
Your template {{pl}} is really cool!
Robert: Chris Day just applied your template to the list of my created articles on my Talk page ... and it is really cool!! Just wanted to let you know I like it a lot. - Milton Beychok 14:11, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
- Thanks! The idea was inspired by Lee Berger and the code was modified from something I saw Chris do with the subpages template. -Joe Quick 18:05, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
- I have created over 45 new articles and I don't check on each of them every day. Recently, two of them were nominated for Approval, but I wasn't aware of that until the last day of the Approval period. Right now, the {{pl}} creates a green check mark image when an article has been approved. Would it be much of a chore to have it create some other mark when an article has been nominated for approval? Perhaps simply a different color check mark? - Milton Beychok 23:22, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
Joe, I took the liberty. See Template:Pl#Up_for_approval. Chris Day 04:00, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
Hi Chris, as I liked this implementation, I tried the same for {{rpl}} but seem to have to come too close to the system limits again for some of the larger article lists (core and biology). Any suggestions? -- Daniel Mietchen 04:27, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
Thank you
Today the Dokdo article will be approved. Thank you for all the efforts you put in. The article is in so much better shape now. I can compare the two and see so much positive difference. If you hadn't come in to check on the article, I wouldn't have checked on it either and several key flaws would have remained on the article upon approval. Thank you again. (Chunbum Park 11:00, 21 July 2008 (CDT))
- You're welcome. If our collaboration helped to make the article better, then the Citizendium system is clearly working. --Joe Quick 09:39, 22 July 2008 (CDT)