User talk:George Swan/Sandbox/Heather Cerveny: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa m (Move notice to Talk: page) |
imported>George Swan (→Could you please explain...: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{WPauthor|No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heather_Cerveny&oldid=131544739 this version]. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 04:19, 27 February 2008 (CST)}} | {{WPauthor|No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title{{=}}Heather_Cerveny&oldid{{=}}131544739 this version].|[[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 04:19, 27 February 2008 (CST)}} | ||
== Recommend deletion == | |||
This speaks of things that were to have happened in late 2006; there are no resolutions of any of the charges. Given the amount of information that has been made available, is one paralegal's affidavit really significant? | |||
The article clearly needed maintenance and has not been maintained. Since it is about a presumably living individual, I recommend deletion. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Could you please explain... == | |||
[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User%3AGeorge_Swan%2FSandbox%2FHeather_Cerveny&diff=100467527&oldid=100381098 This edit] removes | |||
the passages: | |||
:''"Previous inquiries, like the [[Schmidt report]], concluded that abuse at the camps was degrading but did not rise to the level of "inhumane".<ref name=Def050713>[http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2005/20050713_2053.html Alleged Guantanamo Abuse Did Not Rise to Level of 'Inhumane'], ''[[Department of Defense]]'', [[July 13]] [[2005]]</ref>"'' | |||
:''"While his report has not been made public, and Colonel Basset has made no public comment about it, various military spokesmen have commented on it, repeating the claim that an al Qaeda training manual counseled al Qaeda operatives to lie about being abused, and insisting that abuse of captives was against policy." | |||
A version of Bassett's report has been made public now. I think updating the article requires restoration of these excised passages. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 12:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 22 April 2011
The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of this version. | |
| George Swan 04:19, 27 February 2008 (CST) |
Recommend deletion
This speaks of things that were to have happened in late 2006; there are no resolutions of any of the charges. Given the amount of information that has been made available, is one paralegal's affidavit really significant?
The article clearly needed maintenance and has not been maintained. Since it is about a presumably living individual, I recommend deletion. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
This edit removes the passages:
- "Previous inquiries, like the Schmidt report, concluded that abuse at the camps was degrading but did not rise to the level of "inhumane".[1]"
- "While his report has not been made public, and Colonel Basset has made no public comment about it, various military spokesmen have commented on it, repeating the claim that an al Qaeda training manual counseled al Qaeda operatives to lie about being abused, and insisting that abuse of captives was against policy."
A version of Bassett's report has been made public now. I think updating the article requires restoration of these excised passages. George Swan 12:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)