User talk:ElectionJune2016/Referenda/3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson (Created page with "It strikes me that high priority should be given to bringing the EC wiki back on line. At present it seems to be impossible to find out what some of the policies we're suppose...") |
imported>John Stephenson (yes, will add) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Less important perhaps are the old fora, though there are lots of useful ideas and links there to help us avoid having to reinvent the wheel. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 14:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC) | Less important perhaps are the old fora, though there are lots of useful ideas and links there to help us avoid having to reinvent the wheel. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 14:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Yes - will add. Unfortunately, most EC passed motions were never copied here. I did add a [[CZ:Rules#Editorial Council rules (to sort)|list]] of the ones that affect existing policy, but only the titles. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] ([[User talk:John Stephenson|talk]]) 20:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:32, 23 May 2016
It strikes me that high priority should be given to bringing the EC wiki back on line. At present it seems to be impossible to find out what some of the policies we're supposed to be following actually are.
Less important perhaps are the old fora, though there are lots of useful ideas and links there to help us avoid having to reinvent the wheel. Peter Jackson (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes - will add. Unfortunately, most EC passed motions were never copied here. I did add a list of the ones that affect existing policy, but only the titles. John Stephenson (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)