User talk:David Still: Difference between revisions
imported>David Tribe (→Hello) |
imported>David Tribe (→Hello) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I actually have basic structural misgivings about the Metabolism article too, but I let them pass. (probably in Talk)- re stages of metabolism [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:24, 17 February 2007 (CST) | I actually have basic structural misgivings about the Metabolism article too, but I let them pass. (probably in Talk)- re stages of metabolism [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:24, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Another article where grammer fine tuning would be greast is RNA interference, coming up for approval this weekend. Be awre that Chris Day has a sentance or two to meld in and than radical change will creat huge delaydss . We realy want to et more articles approved [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 01:31, 17 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 02:31, 17 February 2007
Hello
Because I don't like seeing red links... :) -- Andrew Lih 08:04, 29 November 2006 (CST)
Glad to see you're still with us. Be careful with that blog it's easy to sound too critcal whether you mean it or not. Hopefully a chance for a fresh start for both sides here. :) Chris Day (Talk) 11:12, 9 February 2007 (CST)
I'm also very pleased too that you're active here. From another David from Oz David Tribe 12:13, 9 February 2007 (CST)
I actually have basic structural misgivings about the Metabolism article too, but I let them pass. (probably in Talk)- re stages of metabolism David Tribe 01:24, 17 February 2007 (CST)
Another article where grammer fine tuning would be greast is RNA interference, coming up for approval this weekend. Be awre that Chris Day has a sentance or two to meld in and than radical change will creat huge delaydss . We realy want to et more articles approved David Tribe 01:31, 17 February 2007 (CST)