User:Tomas Kindahl: Difference between revisions
imported>Tomas Kindahl No edit summary |
imported>Tomas Kindahl No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in Wikipedia to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. '''However:''' I will forsake neither Wikipedia nor Citizendium – I'm neither a refugee from Wikipedia, nor a | Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in Wikipedia to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. '''However:''' I will forsake neither Wikipedia nor Citizendium – I'm neither a refugee from Wikipedia, nor a dissenter, and I like the informal culture of Wikipedia – but the quality of some articles in Wikipedia, not only religion and philosophy, but the ueber-factual tone of some physics articles annoy me, so I will try the Citizendium culture too. | ||
My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees. I think that the manual [[CZ:Article mechanics]] is just common sense and a ''"but I took that for granted as a Wikipedia article too"''. | My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees. I think that the manual [[CZ:Article mechanics]] is just common sense and a ''"but I took that for granted as a Wikipedia article too"''. | ||
Revision as of 09:14, 14 July 2010
Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in Wikipedia to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. However: I will forsake neither Wikipedia nor Citizendium – I'm neither a refugee from Wikipedia, nor a dissenter, and I like the informal culture of Wikipedia – but the quality of some articles in Wikipedia, not only religion and philosophy, but the ueber-factual tone of some physics articles annoy me, so I will try the Citizendium culture too.
My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees. I think that the manual CZ:Article mechanics is just common sense and a "but I took that for granted as a Wikipedia article too".