User:George Swan/sandbox/United States Army Field Manual on interrogation: Difference between revisions
< User:George Swan | sandbox
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (then let's just Move it to a new page with the correct title, stick in a corrective sentence or so, and then I will vanish this article title) |
imported>Larry Sanger (Moving discussion text to talk page. No discussion of articles should appear on an article page.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{speedydelete|This article is not maintainable in its present form, has not been updated, is incorrect even in out-of-date descriptions. There is no document called "United States Army Field Manual on interrogation". As an expert in the field, I have never seen such a title, past or present. The thrust of this article is about Bush Administration policymakers that referred, incorrectly, to such a manual. There can be articles about interrogation policy, and there can be articles about the actual manuals. For a more detailed and accurate coverage of the subject, see [[Human-source intelligence]]. This is an Editor Instruction under [[CZ:Article Deletion Policy]], citing "the article is of such low quality (in terms of inaccuracy, bias, poor writing, or whatever) that it would be more efficient to start over than to try to clean up the current one (this also can be achieved by blanking, if one does in fact wish to start over); " | [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC), Military Editor}} | {{speedydelete|This article is not maintainable in its present form, has not been updated, is incorrect even in out-of-date descriptions. There is no document called "United States Army Field Manual on interrogation". As an expert in the field, I have never seen such a title, past or present. The thrust of this article is about Bush Administration policymakers that referred, incorrectly, to such a manual. There can be articles about interrogation policy, and there can be articles about the actual manuals. For a more detailed and accurate coverage of the subject, see [[Human-source intelligence]]. This is an Editor Instruction under [[CZ:Article Deletion Policy]], citing "the article is of such low quality (in terms of inaccuracy, bias, poor writing, or whatever) that it would be more efficient to start over than to try to clean up the current one (this also can be achieved by blanking, if one does in fact wish to start over); " | [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC), Military Editor}} | ||
Revision as of 15:27, 14 February 2009
This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.
 |
| This article is not maintainable in its present form, has not been updated, is incorrect even in out-of-date descriptions. There is no document called "United States Army Field Manual on interrogation". As an expert in the field, I have never seen such a title, past or present. The thrust of this article is about Bush Administration policymakers that referred, incorrectly, to such a manual. There can be articles about interrogation policy, and there can be articles about the actual manuals. For a more detailed and accurate coverage of the subject, see Human-source intelligence. This is an Editor Instruction under CZ:Article Deletion Policy, citing "the article is of such low quality (in terms of inaccuracy, bias, poor writing, or whatever) that it would be more efficient to start over than to try to clean up the current one (this also can be achieved by blanking, if one does in fact wish to start over); " |
| See also pages that link to this page. |
| Howard C. Berkowitz 04:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC), Military Editor |