User:George Swan/sandbox/Chatter (signals intelligence): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
m (fix refs)
imported>George Swan
(fix refs)
Line 5: Line 5:
| title=Plots, evidence and chatter put U.S. on alert
| title=Plots, evidence and chatter put U.S. on alert
| publisher=[[CNN]]
| publisher=[[CNN]]
| date=[[October 10]] [[2002]]
| date=10 October 2002
| accessdate=2007-11-21
| accessdate=2007-11-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Monitoring "chatter" is an example of [[traffic analysis]] a sub-field of [[signals intelligence]].{{ref|Fox}}  Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring who and when suspects communicate.
Monitoring "chatter" is an example of [[traffic analysis]] a sub-field of [[signals intelligence]]. Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring when and with whom suspects communicate.
Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm.  Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.<ref name=Cnn20040806>
Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm.   
Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.<ref name=Cnn20040806>
{{cite news
{{cite news
| url=http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/08/06/terror.wrap/index.html  
| url=http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/08/06/terror.wrap/index.html  
| title=Slowdown in 'chatter' worries officials: Drop in intercepted communication also noticed before 9/11
| title=Slowdown in 'chatter' worries officials: Drop in intercepted communication also noticed before 9/11
| publisher=[[CNN]]
| publisher=[[CNN]]
| date=[[August 6]] [[2004]]
| date=6 August 2004
| accessdate=2007-11-21
| accessdate=2007-11-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>

Revision as of 21:53, 23 March 2008

This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.

Chatter is a term used in the United States "war on terror". Intelligence officials, not having better metrics, monitor the volume of the electronic communication, to or from suspected terrorists, to determine whether there is cause for alarm. They referred to the electronic communication as chatter.[1]

Monitoring "chatter" is an example of traffic analysis a sub-field of signals intelligence. Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring when and with whom suspects communicate. Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm. Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.[2]

Some incidents, like the capture of the "Algerian Six", were triggered largely by an increase in "chatter".

References