User:George Swan/sandbox/Chatter (signals intelligence): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>George Swan
(fix refs)
imported>George Swan
(see talk)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Chatter''' is a term used in the [[United States]] "[[war on terror]]".  [[intelligence (espionage)|Intelligence]] officials, not having better metrics, monitor the '''volume''' of the electronic communication, to or from suspected terrorists, to determine whether there is cause for alarm.  They referred to the electronic communication as chatter.<ref name=Cnn20021010>
'''Chatter''' is a term attributed to [[United States]] officials, who explaint that by monitoring the '''volume''' of the electronic communication, to or from suspected terrorists they can determine whether there is cause for alarm.  They refer to the electronic communication as chatter.<ref name=Cnn20021010>
{{cite news
{{cite news
| url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/10/terror.roundup/  
| url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/10/terror.roundup/  
Line 9: Line 9:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Monitoring "chatter" is an example of [[traffic analysis]] a sub-field of [[signals intelligence]]. Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring when and with whom suspects communicate.
Monitoring chatter is an example of [[traffic analysis]] a sub-field of [[signals intelligence]]. Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring when and with whom suspects communicate.
Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm.   
Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm.   
Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.<ref name=Cnn20040806>
Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.<ref name=Cnn20040806>
Line 19: Line 19:
| accessdate=2007-11-21
| accessdate=2007-11-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
Some incidents, like the capture of the "[[Algerian Six]]", were triggered largely by an increase in "chatter".


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 22:57, 3 November 2008

This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.

Chatter is a term attributed to United States officials, who explaint that by monitoring the volume of the electronic communication, to or from suspected terrorists they can determine whether there is cause for alarm. They refer to the electronic communication as chatter.[1]

Monitoring chatter is an example of traffic analysis a sub-field of signals intelligence. Intelligence specialists believe that they can learn significant information by methodically monitoring when and with whom suspects communicate. Even if they don't think they understand the real meaning of what suspected terrorists are saying to one another, they regard an increase in the number of the messages as a significant cause for alarm. Paradoxically, they also regard a decrease in the number of messages as a cause for alarm.[2]

References