User:George Swan: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
imported>Chunbum Park (guantanamo) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The work of employees of US Federal agencies, in performance of their duties, is in the public domain. One can find cool images there if one does a google image search confined to the '''".mil"''' or '''".gov"'''. Not all images this turns up will be public domain. Some State agencies are also under the .gov domain. Photos may be the product of an employee of a firm which works, on contract, for the US Federal government. Those aren't PD. And neither, of course, are images that have a credit to a third party. [[User:George Swan/PDimages|US PD images]] | The work of employees of US Federal agencies, in performance of their duties, is in the public domain. One can find cool images there if one does a google image search confined to the '''".mil"''' or '''".gov"'''. Not all images this turns up will be public domain. Some State agencies are also under the .gov domain. Photos may be the product of an employee of a firm which works, on contract, for the US Federal government. Those aren't PD. And neither, of course, are images that have a credit to a third party. [[User:George Swan/PDimages|US PD images]] | ||
==Guantanamo== | |||
Ok, well I did mention "PS you could have worked on it @ Wiki".. You could have been more accurate on your part about how much time you've spent.. | |||
I've thoroughly read the difference in revision - yours is too descriptive on how the prisoners are detained/mistreated - i mean, as if they are although they are definitely not supposed to be. "but were still being shackled to the floor." It's weasel wording (in Wikipedia its called that), and Dr. Jensen's edits don't leave anything out except those weasel wordings. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 07:51, 9 April 2008 (CDT)) | |||
[[Category:CZ Authors|Swan, George]] | [[Category:CZ Authors|Swan, George]] | ||
Revision as of 07:51, 9 April 2008
Bio
Among my interests are the history of science, nautical history, and social justice. In recent years I have been writing about the implications of the "global war on terror".
In September of 2005 I came across unclassified dossiers from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals held for captives held in extrajudicial detention in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.
On March 3 2006, in response to a court order, the Department of Defense released 60 large portable document format files containing several hundred transcripts from the CSR Tribunals, I set myself the goal of reading through them. Since then the DoD has released an additional 10,000 or so pages of documents. I plan to read them all.
Writing about this material, on a project like the Citizendium, can be difficult, because authors have to keep from inserting their own conclusions and interpretations. So, I try to make more of an effort to maintain neutrality.
I think anyone who has a concern that I have lapsed from neutrality will be satisfied that I take their ocncern seriously. I'll ask only that you be specific. George Swan 17:15, 18 October 2007 (CDT)
Work
The rest of this page will point at my rough work, and the tools I use.
Public Domain and free images I have uploaded
Maps
I have created one hundred or so maps, all using a free online map-making tool Other people make much better maps than mine. I'd be happy to get pointers. But for freely distributable maps that can be created very easily, this tool can't be beat.
Images from US Federal agencies
The work of employees of US Federal agencies, in performance of their duties, is in the public domain. One can find cool images there if one does a google image search confined to the ".mil" or ".gov". Not all images this turns up will be public domain. Some State agencies are also under the .gov domain. Photos may be the product of an employee of a firm which works, on contract, for the US Federal government. Those aren't PD. And neither, of course, are images that have a credit to a third party. US PD images
Guantanamo
Ok, well I did mention "PS you could have worked on it @ Wiki".. You could have been more accurate on your part about how much time you've spent..
I've thoroughly read the difference in revision - yours is too descriptive on how the prisoners are detained/mistreated - i mean, as if they are although they are definitely not supposed to be. "but were still being shackled to the floor." It's weasel wording (in Wikipedia its called that), and Dr. Jensen's edits don't leave anything out except those weasel wordings. (Chunbum Park 07:51, 9 April 2008 (CDT))