User:David MacQuigg/Sandbox/Nuclear fuel cycle/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subpages}} * A sankey diagram showing mass flows from mine to metal would be instructive * The thorium cycle should have a similar diagram to the U.cycle. * A comma must be missing ad low enriched fuel grade U: 3,5%, not 35% * Costs, waste flows and the interrelationship with timing should be mentioned in more detail * With frequent links there is no need to go into great detail, but since wastes and risks are quite different at different points the reader might find...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:10, 14 March 2024
This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.
- A sankey diagram showing mass flows from mine to metal would be instructive
- The thorium cycle should have a similar diagram to the U.cycle.
- A comma must be missing ad low enriched fuel grade U: 3,5%, not 35%
- Costs, waste flows and the interrelationship with timing should be mentioned in more detail
- With frequent links there is no need to go into great detail, but since wastes and risks are quite different at different points the reader might find it useful to find a short description and the be able to click trough to the subthemes.
paul hofseth