User:Boris Tsirelson

Professor of mathematics; details. Also a Wikipedian; details.

Articles that I created

• Non-Borel set
• Conditioning (probability)
• Space (mathematics)
• Probability space
• Theory (mathematics)

Articles I've contributed to

Plane (geometry)‎

Line (geometry)

Articles approved by me

Neighbourhood (topology)

Countable set

Geometric sequence

On approval

To a reader

Trust the information in the articles approved by me as much as you trust the information in mathematical textbooks. (In both cases errors are possible but quite rare.)

To an author (editor, constable etc)

Here is my opinion, probably controversial. All that is only about mathematical articles; about others I have no opinion.

Articles may be compared according to: importance of the topic; accessibility; scope; coherence, and many other criteria. Best articles may be rewarded somehow. However, the approval is not a kind of reward! The approval mechanism is the feature of CZ. If a trustworthy article remains "unapproved, subject to disclaimer, not to be cited", it is a loss for readers and CZ.

An approved article can and should be developed further. But (unlike software firms) we should not create versions like 5.3.7, nor even 1.1; after version 1 we should usually proceed toward version 2 (maybe after a year). Only in some regrettable cases version 1.1 becomes necessary.

Improvements of any kind to any article are welcome from everyone at any time, before and after the first approval. They should accumulate toward the next version. A burst of collective activity just before approval, is it a good idea? It can create fuss and bustle, and make an article somewhat mosaic.

Compare it to our Approval Standards Draft for discussion: "Approval should not be denied on the grounds that the article has omissions, unless these undermine the overall balance and accuracy of the article.

Approval is an ongoing process; even if an editor believes that the article has some significant shortcomings, then the article may still be approved, but the editor should declare any criticisms or reservations at the top of the article Talk page to direct further improvements to the article."

A quote

It is better for someone to never come to CZ than for them to come to CZ, get a bad first impression and never come back. --Chris Key 01:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Notes for myself

Links

Sandbox1

Talk:Macromolecular_chemistry + CZ:Approval Process + CZ Talk:Approval Standards + User talk:Approvals Manager

Measure (mathematics) + Compact space + Cardinal number + Covariance + Elementary function + Natural number + Necessary and sufficient + Quadratic equation

CZ:Mathematics Workgroup + Category:Mathematics Authors + CZ:Formatting mathematics + CZ:Dozen Essentials + CZ:Introduction to CZ for Wikipedians + CZ:Quick Start + CZ:Home + CZ:Article Mechanics + CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles + CZ:Subpages + CZ:How to edit an article + CZ:The Article Checklist + CZ:Using the Subpages template + CZ:Start article with subpages + CZ:Bibliography + CZ:Citation style + CZ:How to edit an article + CZ:How to make tables + CZ:Images

CZ:Statistics

CZ:Core Articles/Mathematics + CZ:Core Articles

User:Jitse Niesen + User:Michael Hardy + User:Milton Beychok + User:Peter Schmitt + User:Hans Adler + User:Mark Wainwright

Talk:Boiling_point/Draft

Complex number + Prime number + Continuum hypothesis + Neighbourhood (topology) + Probability distribution + Entropy of a probability distribution

Sigma algebra + Measure (mathematics) + Measure theory + Ito process + Martingale + Stochastic process + Measure space + Borel set + Measurable space + Conditional probability

definition

Know-how

ax+by+cz=d. — {{nowrap|''ax+by+cz''<nowiki>=</nowiki>''d''.}}