U.S. foreign policy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs" to "Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs")
(45 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''U.S. Foreign Policy''' covers the foreign relations and diplomacy of the United States since 1775.
{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
{{seealso|History of U.S. foreign policy}}
Ultimate responsibility for '''United States foreign policy''' rests with the [[President of the United States of  America]]. For the ratification of formal treaties, he or she must obtain the advice and consent of the Senate.


==See also ==
In the modern practice of foreign policy, formally, the senior foreign policy official below the President is the [[U.S. Secretary of State]], [[Hillary Clinton]]. In practice, the critical decisionmakers are the members of the [[National Security Council]], which includes the Secretary of State. Other major influencers are in the National Security Council staff, headed by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, [[James Jones]]. The [[U.S. Department of Defense]], under Secretary [[Robert Gates]], obviously has a major effect, as does the [[United States intelligence community]], coordinated by [[Director of National Intelligence]] [[Dennis Blair]].
* [[Diplomacy, U.S., Timeline]]


* [[9-11 Attack]]
Foreign policy formulation and execution is structured on regional and functional areas. Over recent years, there has been an attempt to reconcile the regional definitions of the various departments and agencies, so a country is not under one bureau of the State Department but under a different [[Unified Combatant Command]] in the military.  This is not completely successful; the countries of the Mediterranean littoral as well as the Levant are under one Assistant Secretary of State, but the [[United States European Command]] is responsible for the former but the [[United States Central Command]] for the latter.
* [[Afghanistan War (1978-92)]]
* [[American Revolution]], 1775-1783
* [[Berlin Wall]], 1961-89
* [[Central Intelligence Agency]]
* [[Cold War]], 1947-89
* [[Confederate States of America]]
* [[Containment]]
* [[Cuban Missile Crisis]], 1962
* [[Detente]]
* [[Diplomacy, U.S., Timeline]]
* [[Eisenhower Doctrine]], 1957
* [[Embargo of 1807]]
* [[Fourteen Points]], 1918
* [[Gulf War]], 1990-91
* [[Iraq War]], 2003+
* [[Isolationism]]
* [[Jay Treaty]], 1794
* [[Korean War]], 1950-53
* [[Lend Lease]], 1941-45
* [[List of scholarly journals in international relations]]
* [[Louisiana Purchase]], 1803
* [[Manifest Destiny]]
* [[Marshall Plan]], 1848-51
* [[McNary-Haugen Bill]], 1920s; (never passed)
* [[Mexican-American War]], 1846-48
* [[Monroe Doctrine]], 1823+
* [[NATO]], 1949+
* [[NSC-68]], 1950
* [[Quasi-War]], 1798-1800
* [[Reagan Doctrine]]
* [[Rollback]]
* [[Roosevelt Corollary]], 1904
* [[Spanish American War]], 1898
* [[Tariff, U.S. history]]
* [[U.S. Civil War]]
* [[United States State Department]]
* [[Versailles Treaty]], 1919
* [[Vietnam War]], 1965-73
* [[War of 1812]], 1812-15
** [[War of 1812, Causes]]
* [[Wilsonianism]], 1914+
* [[World War I]], 1917-18
* [[World War II]], 1941-45
* [[Zimmerman Telegram]], 1917
===See also leaders===
* [[Dean Acheson]]
* [[Jane Addams]]
* [[John Adams]]
* [[John Quincy Adams]]
* [[Charles A. Beard]]
* [[James G. Blaine]]
* [[John C. Calhoun]]
* [[Jimmy Carter]]
* [[Henry Clay]]
* [[Jesse Helms]]
* [[Herbert Hoover]]
* [[Harry Hopkins]]
* [[Edward M. House]]
* [[Thomas Jefferson]]
* [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]
* [[John F. Kennedy]]
* [[George Kennan]]
* [[Henry Kissinger]]
* [[James Monroe]]
* [[Richard Nixon]]
* [[James K. Polk]]
* [[Ronald Reagan]]
* [[Eleanor Roosevelt]]
* [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]
* [[Theodore Roosevelt]]
* [[Josiah Strong]]
* [[Harry S. Truman]]
* [[Daniel Webster]]
* [[Wendell Willkie]]
* [[Woodrow Wilson]]


Foreign policy also needs to be considered in  relation to the U.S. and world situation of the time.
==Regional==
===Africa===
U.S African policy is principally focused on the Subsaharan part of the continent. For reasons of colonial sensitivity, the [[United States Africa Command]] is considered a unified subcommand of [[United States European Command]].
===Europe and Eurasia===
===East Asia and Pacific===
[[North Korea]] is the hot spot, and the U.S. regional priority is to insist on the [[Six-Party Talks]], which also recognize China as a key broker.
===Near East===
{{main|U.S. policy towards the Middle East}}
More than in most areas in the world, policies twist and turn and involve multiple countries. Nevertheless, there are some basic principles both for the region and for countries.
====Egypt====
While the U.S. continues to provide major economic support to Egypt, there is increasing concern about succession, with President [[Hosni Mubarrak]] reported to be in poor health.
====Iran====
{{main|U.S. policy towards Iran}}
The Obama administration avoids the military threats implied by the previous administration, by the U.S. or others. While it is giving moral encouragement to the domestic protesters following the 2009 election, it is taking time, establishing a moral position, and waiting on events. It does appear to be holding back on direct engagement at any high level.


==Bibliography==
It is quite serious about pressuring Iran to stop what is seen as a nuclear weapons program, b as the best means to accomplish this goal. Instead, a consensus is growing, with allies, to use [[economic warfare]], targeted at Iran's lack of internal petroleum refining capacity, and thus, while ironically an oil producer, a gasoline importer. <ref name=UPI3009-08-03>{{citation
* Bailey, Thomas A.  ''Diplomatic History of the American People'' (1940), standard older textbook
| title = Obama considers Iran gas cut-off
* Beisner, Robert L. ed, ''American Foreign Relations since 1600: A Guide to the Literature'' (2003), 2 vol. 16,300 annotated entries evaluate every major book and scholarly article.
| journal = United Press International
* Bemis, Samuel Flagg. ''A Diplomatic History of the United States'' (1952) old standard textbook
  | url = http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/08/03/Report-Obama-considers-Iran-gas-cut-off/UPI-42911249301096/
* Bemis, Samuel Flagg,  and Grace Gardner Griffin. ''Guide to the Diplomatic History of the United States 1775-1921'' (1935) bibliographies
| date = 3 August 2009}}</ref>
* Brune, Lester H. ''Chronological History of U.S. Foreign Relations'' (2003), 1400 pages
====Iraq====
* Burns, Richard Dean, ed. ''Guide to American Foreign Relations since 1700'' (1983) highly detailed annotated bibliography
{{main|U.S. policy towards Iraq}}
* DeConde, Alexander, Richard Dean Burns, Fredrik Logevall, and Louise B. Ketz, eds. ''Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy'' 3 vol (2001), 2200 pages; 120 long articles by specialists.
{{seealso|Iraq War}}
* DeConde, Alexander. ''A History of American Foreign Policy'' (1963) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=65362550 online edition]
====Israel====
* Findling, John E. ed. ''Dictionary of American Diplomatic History'' 2nd ed. 1989. 700pp; 1200 short articles.
====Lebanon====
* Flanders, Stephen A, and Carl N. Flanders. ''Dictionary of American Foreign Affairs'' (1993) 835 pp, short articles
====Syria====
* Hogan, Michael J. ed. ''Paths to Power: The Historiography of American Foreign Relations to 1941'' (2000) essays on main topics
* Hogan, Michael J. and Thomas G. Paterson, eds. ''Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations'' (1991) essays on historiography
* Lafeber, Walter. '' The American Age: United States Foreign Policy at Home and Abroad, 1750 to Present'' (2nd ed 1994) textbook; 884pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=98818311 online edition]
* Paterson, Thomas G. et al. ''American Foreign Relations'' (4th ed. 1995), recent textbook


==Online resources==
===South and Central Asia===
* [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-8684(200311)72%3A4%3C495%3ABATCCT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I ''Foreign Relations of the United States'' (FRUS), 1861-1960, 372 volumes complete text. This  series is the official documentary historical record of U.S. foreign policy decisions]


====Afghanistan and Pakistan====
{{main|U.S. policy towards Afghanistan}}
{{main|U.S. policy towards Pakistan}}
In many respects, it sees this as one problem; the political geography of the area also supports the argument that the [[Durand Line]] border between the two may have been convenient for the British, but does not reflect the boundaries of the [[Pashtun people]].
===Western Hemisphere Affairs===


====notes====
==Functional==
<references/>
A number of these areas will definitely involve more agencies than the Department of State.
* International Organization Affairs (IO)
===Security===
*[[Counterterrorism]]
* [[Peace operations]]
* [[Arms Control]]
* International Security and Nonproliferation (ISN)
===Economic===
* Foreign assistance
* Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs(E)
* Economic, Energy and Business Affairs (EEB)
*[[National Marine Fisheries Service]]
===Democracy promotion and information===
* Democracy and Global Affairs (G)
* Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs (R)
* International Information Programs (IIP)
*[[Propaganda]]; [[Voice of America]]; [[Broadcasting Board of Governors]], psychological operations staff, National Clandestine Service, [[Central Intelligence Agency]]
===Cultural===
* Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
===Law enforcement, including drug trade===
* International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL)
* [[Drug Enforcement Administration]]
* [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]]
* War Crimes Issues (S/WCI)
* Office of Special Investigations, [[U.S. Department of Justice]]
===Human Rights===
* Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM)
* Global Women's Issues (S/GWI)
===Science===
* Global AIDS Coordinator, Office of (S/GAC)
* Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES)
* [[National Science Foundation]]
* [[National Institutes of Health]]
* [[Centers for Disease Control]]
* [[National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration]]
==Doctrines==
{{r|Monroe Doctrine}}
{{r|Containment policy}}
{{r|American exceptionalism}}
===Nuclear deterrence===
===Counterinsurgency===
{{seealso|Vietnam, war, and the United States of America}}
While the U.S. had dealt with insurgencies well before World War II, the situation increased significantly in the Cold War. The 1940 U.S. Marine Corps ''Manual for Small Wars'' remains a reference based on experience in Latin America and elsewhere.


[[Category:History Workgroup]]
In Vietnam, which combined both insurgency and proxy war, the U.S. struggled to find an effective counterinsurgency strategy, eventually refocused on conventional military action, and left the country, which was overthrown by a conventional invasion.
[[Category:Politics Workgroup]]
 
[[Category:CZ Live]]
Counterinsurgency (COIN) is alive and well in Afghanistan and Iraq, and there is a distinct split among soldier-statesmen as to the correct balance among [[counterterrorism]], "conventional" military forces, and [[counterinsurgency]] to include [[peace operations#nation-building|nation-building]].  Among the best-known counterinsurgents are General [[David Petraeus]].  Petraeus' doctoral dissertation dealt with U.S. policy toward Vietnam, <ref name=PetPhD>{{citation
| url = http://www.brianbeutler.com/postvietnameramilitary.pdf
| title = The American Military and the Lessons of Vietnam: A study of military influence and the use of force in the post-Vietnam era
| publisher = doctoral dissertation, Princeton University
| year = 1987
}}</ref> a far more active role, than traditional for generals, in developing the Army doctrinal manual on counterinsurgency. <ref name = FM3-24>{{citation  | publisher = US Department of the Army 
| author = [[John Nagl]], David Petraeus, [[James Amos]], [[Sarah Sewall]]
  | title = [[Field Manual 3-24: Counterinsurgency]]
  | date = December 2006
  | url = http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf}}</ref>
 
Sometimes informally called the "COINdanistas", this is an influential school of thought that blends political, social and military strategies. The [[Center for a New American Security]], a strategic think tank, has many of its principals in the Obama Administration. Petraeus, now the U.S. commander for the Middle East, has used advisers including  David Kilcullen and [[H.R. McMaster]],  known for open criticism of policies, even while advising. <ref name=WP2007-02-05>{{citation
| title = Officers With PhDs Advising War Effort
| first = [[Thomas Ricks]]
| journal = Washington Post  | date = February 5, 2007
| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/04/AR2007020401196.html}}</ref>
 
[[Andrew Bacevich]] is a critic of what he regards as an overemphasis on [[counterinsurgency]] in the U.S. military, which he sees as a revisionist belief that the [[Vietnam War]] could have been won with the right long-term approach, which he terms that of the "Crusaders" for the new view. He sees a more appropriate lesson as the "Conservative" one from the [[Weinberger-Powell Doctrine]]. <ref name=Atlantic2008-10>{{citation
| date = October 2008 | journal = Atlantic
| title = The Petraeus Doctrine: Iraq-style counterinsurgency is fast becoming the U.S. Army’s organizing principle. Is our military preparing to fight the next war, or the last one?
| author = [[Andrew Bacevich]]
| url = http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810/petraeus-doctrine}}</ref> He favors a "defensive strategy" of "containment." <ref name=Nation>{{citation
|url = http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/350252/obama_s_limits_an_interview_with_andrew_bacevich
| title = Obama's Limits: An Interview With Andrew Bacevich | journal = [[The Nation (magazine)]]
| author = Jon Wiener | date = 28 August 2008}}</ref> Colonel [[Gian Gentile]] is concerned with a decline in conventional military forces, although Gentile recognizes the conventional enemy is not the mass of the Soviet Union.
==References==
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 08:34, 21 March 2024

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.
See also: History of U.S. foreign policy

Ultimate responsibility for United States foreign policy rests with the President of the United States of America. For the ratification of formal treaties, he or she must obtain the advice and consent of the Senate.

In the modern practice of foreign policy, formally, the senior foreign policy official below the President is the U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. In practice, the critical decisionmakers are the members of the National Security Council, which includes the Secretary of State. Other major influencers are in the National Security Council staff, headed by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, James Jones. The U.S. Department of Defense, under Secretary Robert Gates, obviously has a major effect, as does the United States intelligence community, coordinated by Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair.

Foreign policy formulation and execution is structured on regional and functional areas. Over recent years, there has been an attempt to reconcile the regional definitions of the various departments and agencies, so a country is not under one bureau of the State Department but under a different Unified Combatant Command in the military. This is not completely successful; the countries of the Mediterranean littoral as well as the Levant are under one Assistant Secretary of State, but the United States European Command is responsible for the former but the United States Central Command for the latter.

Foreign policy also needs to be considered in relation to the U.S. and world situation of the time.

Regional

Africa

U.S African policy is principally focused on the Subsaharan part of the continent. For reasons of colonial sensitivity, the United States Africa Command is considered a unified subcommand of United States European Command.

Europe and Eurasia

East Asia and Pacific

North Korea is the hot spot, and the U.S. regional priority is to insist on the Six-Party Talks, which also recognize China as a key broker.

Near East

For more information, see: U.S. policy towards the Middle East.

More than in most areas in the world, policies twist and turn and involve multiple countries. Nevertheless, there are some basic principles both for the region and for countries.

Egypt

While the U.S. continues to provide major economic support to Egypt, there is increasing concern about succession, with President Hosni Mubarrak reported to be in poor health.

Iran

For more information, see: U.S. policy towards Iran.

The Obama administration avoids the military threats implied by the previous administration, by the U.S. or others. While it is giving moral encouragement to the domestic protesters following the 2009 election, it is taking time, establishing a moral position, and waiting on events. It does appear to be holding back on direct engagement at any high level.

It is quite serious about pressuring Iran to stop what is seen as a nuclear weapons program, b as the best means to accomplish this goal. Instead, a consensus is growing, with allies, to use economic warfare, targeted at Iran's lack of internal petroleum refining capacity, and thus, while ironically an oil producer, a gasoline importer. [1]

Iraq

For more information, see: U.S. policy towards Iraq.
See also: Iraq War

Israel

Lebanon

Syria

South and Central Asia

Afghanistan and Pakistan

For more information, see: U.S. policy towards Afghanistan.
For more information, see: U.S. policy towards Pakistan.

In many respects, it sees this as one problem; the political geography of the area also supports the argument that the Durand Line border between the two may have been convenient for the British, but does not reflect the boundaries of the Pashtun people.

Western Hemisphere Affairs

Functional

A number of these areas will definitely involve more agencies than the Department of State.

  • International Organization Affairs (IO)

Security

Economic

Democracy promotion and information

Cultural

  • Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)

Law enforcement, including drug trade

Human Rights

  • Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM)
  • Global Women's Issues (S/GWI)

Science

Doctrines

Nuclear deterrence

Counterinsurgency

See also: Vietnam, war, and the United States of America

While the U.S. had dealt with insurgencies well before World War II, the situation increased significantly in the Cold War. The 1940 U.S. Marine Corps Manual for Small Wars remains a reference based on experience in Latin America and elsewhere.

In Vietnam, which combined both insurgency and proxy war, the U.S. struggled to find an effective counterinsurgency strategy, eventually refocused on conventional military action, and left the country, which was overthrown by a conventional invasion.

Counterinsurgency (COIN) is alive and well in Afghanistan and Iraq, and there is a distinct split among soldier-statesmen as to the correct balance among counterterrorism, "conventional" military forces, and counterinsurgency to include nation-building. Among the best-known counterinsurgents are General David Petraeus. Petraeus' doctoral dissertation dealt with U.S. policy toward Vietnam, [2] a far more active role, than traditional for generals, in developing the Army doctrinal manual on counterinsurgency. [3]

Sometimes informally called the "COINdanistas", this is an influential school of thought that blends political, social and military strategies. The Center for a New American Security, a strategic think tank, has many of its principals in the Obama Administration. Petraeus, now the U.S. commander for the Middle East, has used advisers including David Kilcullen and H.R. McMaster, known for open criticism of policies, even while advising. [4]

Andrew Bacevich is a critic of what he regards as an overemphasis on counterinsurgency in the U.S. military, which he sees as a revisionist belief that the Vietnam War could have been won with the right long-term approach, which he terms that of the "Crusaders" for the new view. He sees a more appropriate lesson as the "Conservative" one from the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine. [5] He favors a "defensive strategy" of "containment." [6] Colonel Gian Gentile is concerned with a decline in conventional military forces, although Gentile recognizes the conventional enemy is not the mass of the Soviet Union.

References