Thinking/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
< Thinking
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (annotate biblio item) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (→Books: annotate biblio item) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* MeIser D. (2004) [http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10264 ''The Act of Thinking'']. “A Bradford book." ISBN 0-262-13446-2. | [http://books.google.com/books?id=uLs2SDLrP5QC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Google Books preview]. | * MeIser D. (2004) [http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10264 ''The Act of Thinking'']. “A Bradford book." ISBN 0-262-13446-2. | [http://books.google.com/books?id=uLs2SDLrP5QC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Google Books preview]. | ||
** <font face="Gill Sans MT"><u>From publisher webpage:</u> Derek Melser argues that the core assumption of both folk psychology and cognitive science—that thinking goes on in the head—is mistaken. Melser argues that thinking is not an intracranial process of any kind, mental or neural, but is rather a learned action of the person.</font> | |||
Revision as of 17:47, 22 June 2012
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Books
- Kahneman D. (2011) Thnking, Fast and Slow. MacMillan. ISBN 9781429969352. | Google Books preview.
- From publisher webpage: The impact of loss aversion and overconfidence on corporate strategies, the difficulties of predicting what will make us happy in the future, the challenges of properly framing risks at work and at home, the profound effect of cognitive biases on everything from playing the stock market to planning the next vacation—each of these can be understood only by knowing how the two systems work together to shape our judgments and decisions.
- MeIser D. (2004) The Act of Thinking. “A Bradford book." ISBN 0-262-13446-2. | Google Books preview.
- From publisher webpage: Derek Melser argues that the core assumption of both folk psychology and cognitive science—that thinking goes on in the head—is mistaken. Melser argues that thinking is not an intracranial process of any kind, mental or neural, but is rather a learned action of the person.