Template talk:Infobox Disease: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen (If this is going to be used it needs to be fixed.) |
imported>Matt Lewis (→ROTFL!: comment) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If this is going to be used it needs to be fixed. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 01:33, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | If this is going to be used it needs to be fixed. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 01:33, 20 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Fixing Infobox== | |||
Ok to copy over the WP version as a basis? As so many articles included the WP infobox template in their copy/paste, seems we should start this way. - [[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 11:07, 7 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Has this worked? Is the problem with the infobox code or CZ? --[[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] 16:32, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
== ICD-10 link in Breast cancer example == | |||
The ICD-10 link leads to Childhood autism for me. I found this out when using the template for the ICD-10 in Alzheimer's disease - that goes straight to Childhood autism too. It's fine on Wikipedia - using the same code. I use Firefox - but that shouldn't be the problem surely. I can't find it using this http://icd9cm.chrisendres.com/ either. --[[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] 21:53, 30 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
== ROTFL! == | |||
When I saw this come up in "Recent changes", I thought it was a page devoted to griping about how large, intrustive and complex infoboxes had become! :-) [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 16:56, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
:Ho ho (maybe on Wikipedia- I know I've had a moan before now re 'sensitive' details!). When I saw your comment come up as a Recent change I thought someone had found an absurdly simple solution to the problem! When you think about it... this info box is certaily unwell (and has been a while too...) The Alzheimer's article currently links to autism - I'm waiting to see if I should remove the problem or, better, fix it. --[[User:Matt Lewis|Matt Lewis]] 18:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 1 April 2008
If this is going to be used it needs to be fixed. Stephen Ewen 01:33, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
Fixing Infobox
Ok to copy over the WP version as a basis? As so many articles included the WP infobox template in their copy/paste, seems we should start this way. - Robert Badgett 11:07, 7 November 2007 (CST)
Has this worked? Is the problem with the infobox code or CZ? --Matt Lewis 16:32, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
ICD-10 link in Breast cancer example
The ICD-10 link leads to Childhood autism for me. I found this out when using the template for the ICD-10 in Alzheimer's disease - that goes straight to Childhood autism too. It's fine on Wikipedia - using the same code. I use Firefox - but that shouldn't be the problem surely. I can't find it using this http://icd9cm.chrisendres.com/ either. --Matt Lewis 21:53, 30 March 2008 (CDT)
ROTFL!
When I saw this come up in "Recent changes", I thought it was a page devoted to griping about how large, intrustive and complex infoboxes had become! :-) J. Noel Chiappa 16:56, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- Ho ho (maybe on Wikipedia- I know I've had a moan before now re 'sensitive' details!). When I saw your comment come up as a Recent change I thought someone had found an absurdly simple solution to the problem! When you think about it... this info box is certaily unwell (and has been a while too...) The Alzheimer's article currently links to autism - I'm waiting to see if I should remove the problem or, better, fix it. --Matt Lewis 18:19, 1 April 2008 (CDT)