Template talk:Credit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 16:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | :-) [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 16:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Me too, I have a vague recollection of you asking me how to do that and I did not notice the subsequent knock on effect. You are correct that with respect to the final code there is no difference, it just gets hidden within a template, transpose if you will. | |||
:I did note all the different version of the credit template. that should not be an issue as the credit template i just read created is reading the content from the pictures credit tempalte. Consequently it is passive with respect to with actual credit version is used when uploading the photo. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 17:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:09, 6 November 2008
So am I correct that the only difference between this and the system I created is that this transposes the ifexist perimeter whereas mine did not but included the verbaige each time? If so, this is superior. I was still learnin'.
Keep in mind CZ:Media_Credit_Lines_within_Articles and the differences of PD, CC, GFL, etc.
- -) Stephen Ewen 16:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Me too, I have a vague recollection of you asking me how to do that and I did not notice the subsequent knock on effect. You are correct that with respect to the final code there is no difference, it just gets hidden within a template, transpose if you will.
- I did note all the different version of the credit template. that should not be an issue as the credit template i just read created is reading the content from the pictures credit tempalte. Consequently it is passive with respect to with actual credit version is used when uploading the photo. Chris Day 17:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)