Talk:World Wheat Economy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


{{stub}}
{{stub}}
The "stub" template should ''never'' go at the top of the article itself.  People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such.  This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.


I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article.  It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified.  Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article.  It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified.  Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:58, 2 April 2007


Article Checklist for "World Wheat Economy"
Workgroup category or categories Agriculture Workgroup, Economics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Joe Quick

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Template:Stub

The "stub" template should never go at the top of the article itself. People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such. This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.

I think we probably should never use {{main}} at the top of an article. It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified. Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --Larry Sanger 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)