Talk:World Wheat Economy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] | [[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]] 16:53, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:59, 2 April 2007 (CDT); [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] | [[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]] 16:53, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}


Line 14: Line 14:


The "stub" template should ''never'' go at the top of the article itself.  People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such.  This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.
The "stub" template should ''never'' go at the top of the article itself.  People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such.  This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.
Besides, the article is no longer a stub by our definition.  Status = 2.


I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article.  It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified.  Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article.  It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified.  Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:59, 2 April 2007


Article Checklist for "World Wheat Economy"
Workgroup category or categories Agriculture Workgroup, Economics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 20:59, 2 April 2007 (CDT); Joe Quick

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.




Template:Stub

The "stub" template should never go at the top of the article itself. People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such. This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.

Besides, the article is no longer a stub by our definition. Status = 2.

I think we probably should never use {{main}} at the top of an article. It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified. Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --Larry Sanger 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:World_Wheat_Economy&oldid=168455"