Talk:White Argentine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Comments: make it a Definition)
imported>Peter Jackson
Line 27: Line 27:
::: '' Term used for Argentinians of European descent, mostly used in a racist context.''
::: '' Term used for Argentinians of European descent, mostly used in a racist context.''
:: and make it a /Definition subpage. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:: and make it a /Definition subpage. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
:::What's racist about the article? Where does it suggest the whites are superior? On the contrary, it mentions at least 3 times ill-treatment and discrimination directed against others. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 14:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:40, 15 December 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Ideologically based phrase used for Argentinians of European descent, mostly in a racist context. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Anthropology and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Removal

Removal suggested by Aleta Curry 22:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Editorial Council: Case 2011-009

Opened: Peter Schmitt 23:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Closed:

Comments

Hello,

This article has just come to the unofficial attention of the Editorial Council, of which I am the Secretary. In the near future, once we have studied it more carefully, it will almost certainly be either moved from Main Space to an area where it will not be easily found by the general public, or it will be deleted entirely. First of all, it appears to be an article imported directly and entirely from Metapedia -- and Citizendium does not allow articles from other sources to imported. Second, it appears to be making an argument about "Whites" in Argentina. I see that the same article, or similar articles, were either banned from Wikipedia or entirely rewritten, because of the apparent "racism" of the article. Citizendium is no different from Wikipedia in our attitude towards racism -- we simply do not permit it, nor anything that might appear to be racist in either intent or appearance. Citizendium welcomes articles about just about any topic in the world, but they MUST be original articles, written for Citizendium, and not copies of articles that have appeared anywhere else, and they must ALWAYS be written in a manner that cannot conceivably be called racist or that is pushing an agenda of any of its authors. Hayford Peirce 22:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to move that the article be removed forthwith, on the grounds that it is an import from Metapedia, and Metapedia is self-avowedly a project with an agenda.
I find the subject inherently problematic and controversial, in that
  1. the Government of Argentine itself does not make this distinction and in fact, to my knowledge the Argentine government does not even ask about ethnicity in its censuses;
  2. the concept of 'white people' is not one that finds its way into current enlightened discourse and such terms are used advisedly and in limited context, for some very good reasons. We avoid racialist discussions that suggest the superiority of one group over another, or imply or lead to the notion of eugenics.
Certainly the article might encompass some topics that would be of interest and benefit to a general encyclopaedia, among these are: Argentine immigration, Argentine demographics, languages of Argentine, religion in Argentina etc., but these must be discussed in an appropriate, non-racist manner.
Aleta Curry 22:39, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
This article clearly is not suitable for CZ. I suggest to replace it by
Term used for Argentinians of European descent, mostly used in a racist context.
and make it a /Definition subpage. --Peter Schmitt 23:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
What's racist about the article? Where does it suggest the whites are superior? On the contrary, it mentions at least 3 times ill-treatment and discrimination directed against others. Peter Jackson 14:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)