Talk:Tecum Umam: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
imported>Stephen Ewen
(This article is the first Google hit with the term Tecum Umam)
Line 21: Line 21:
::1)Doesn't work for me.  Removing headers, building bridges and then re-adding headers tends to do little but make my writing redundant and contrived.  Others are certainly welcome to try - we can always revert if it gets to be too ridiculous.
::1)Doesn't work for me.  Removing headers, building bridges and then re-adding headers tends to do little but make my writing redundant and contrived.  Others are certainly welcome to try - we can always revert if it gets to be too ridiculous.
::2)Agreed.  :-)  I thought so even as I typed it.  If anyone can come up with a better transition, I encourage you to be bold. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 12:14, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
::2)Agreed.  :-)  I thought so even as I typed it.  If anyone can come up with a better transition, I encourage you to be bold. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 12:14, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
==Check this out==
First hit, top of the list:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Tecum+Umam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 19:20, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:20, 8 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Tecum Umam"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Anthropology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:04, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Comment

Very nice work so far, Joe. :-) Stephen Ewen 18:24, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Article Status

Having finished the last of my major planned revisions, I've changed the article status to "developed." While this article could probably benefit from a variety of small changes and stylistic copyediting, I consider it finished. To the best of my knowledge, it is both accurate and complete and it should be ready for approval as soon as a qualified editor comes along (or one of the current ones decides that s/he is qualified).  ;-) --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:09, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

Suggestions: 1) remove all the headings and go over it to make sure it reads as one narrative whole, then re-add them. 2) "The jury is still out"--just too much of a cliche, I think. Very nice work, otherwise! Stephen Ewen 03:43, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
1)Doesn't work for me. Removing headers, building bridges and then re-adding headers tends to do little but make my writing redundant and contrived. Others are certainly welcome to try - we can always revert if it gets to be too ridiculous.
2)Agreed.  :-) I thought so even as I typed it. If anyone can come up with a better transition, I encourage you to be bold. --Joe Quick (Talk) 12:14, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

Check this out

First hit, top of the list:

http://www.google.com/search?q=Tecum+Umam&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Stephen Ewen 19:20, 8 June 2007 (CDT)