Talk:Stage (geology): Difference between revisions
imported>Nereo Preto (more shortly...) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, [[chronostratigraphy]]. | This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, [[chronostratigraphy]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:54, 14 November 2007
This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, chronostratigraphy.
There is a supposedly article on this topic in WP which is rather long: faunal stage. However, that text is really about the concept of biozone, and is a little confused in my view.
Maybe I could add some lines to the article, but I wonder if there is really something else which is essential to say... any suggestions?
Same for Age (geology), of course. I didn't post a comment there, though.
Ciao, Nereo Preto 11:22, 14 November 2006 (CST)
more shortly...
...in other words: this article is brief only because there is not much to say in my view. Thus, please DO NOT DELETE it. Have a talk here or in my personal page before deleting, thanks in advance. --Nereo Preto 02:46, 9 April 2007 (CDT)