Talk:Singapore English: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(Title)
imported>John Stephenson
(article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Singapore English
|                cat1 = Linguistics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 03:41, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
==SCE as a creole==
==SCE as a creole==
I have discussed this issue with [http://www.leeds.ac.uk/english/staff/afg Anthea Fraser Gupta], a leading expert in [[creole language]]s and particularly Singapore Colloquial English. She tells me that there is little evidence that SCE is a creole; rather it's a mixed variety. It never went through a proper [[pidgin language|pidgin]] stage. I also contacted [http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/mark/index.htm Mark Sebba], another well-known creolist, and he didn't support the creole view either. So in the long term I intend to move this page away from making the claim, as found throughout much of the Internet, that SCE is a creole.
I have discussed this issue with [http://www.leeds.ac.uk/english/staff/afg Anthea Fraser Gupta], a leading expert in [[creole language]]s and particularly Singapore Colloquial English. She tells me that there is little evidence that SCE is a creole; rather it's a mixed variety. It never went through a proper [[pidgin language|pidgin]] stage. I also contacted [http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/mark/index.htm Mark Sebba], another well-known creolist, and he didn't support the creole view either. So in the long term I intend to move this page away from making the claim, as found throughout much of the Internet, that SCE is a creole.

Revision as of 03:41, 19 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Singapore English"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 03:41, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





SCE as a creole

I have discussed this issue with Anthea Fraser Gupta, a leading expert in creole languages and particularly Singapore Colloquial English. She tells me that there is little evidence that SCE is a creole; rather it's a mixed variety. It never went through a proper pidgin stage. I also contacted Mark Sebba, another well-known creolist, and he didn't support the creole view either. So in the long term I intend to move this page away from making the claim, as found throughout much of the Internet, that SCE is a creole.

Also, I don't want to sound like a crusty old fuddy-duddy, but if you examine the talk page and logs for the Wikipedia version of this page, you'll find that it was mostly written by a 17-year-old who hasn't studied the subject as yet in a higher education institution. Now, don't get me wrong; in many ways it's a nice page, and more power to him for spreading knowledge. But there really is very little evidence for the creolist view. John Stephenson 00:08, 14 February 2007 (CST)

This should be retitled

This article should be retitled as 'Singaporean English' to reflect the nationality tag. - (Aidan Work 04:39, 19 February 2007 (CST))

The majority of researchers refer to it as 'Singapore English', i.e. the varieties of English spoken in Singapore. If you do a Google search, this is far more common than the alternative. Could put in a redirect, though. John Stephenson 21:16, 19 February 2007 (CST)