Talk:Shigella dysenteriae: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Milton Beychok
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Explaining my revision of references ==
All of the references when I first looked at this article were marked in the main text using HTML (as  <nowiki><sup>number</sup></nowiki>) and then simply listed manually in the References section. I therefore began to revise them to the <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> format:
*Original reference 1 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 1
*Original reference 2 → not found in the text, only in the listed references → moved to "Other sources"
*Original reference 3 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 2
*Original reference 4 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 3
*Original reference 5 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 4
*Original reference 6 → not found in the text and web link no longer available → deleted
*Original reference 7 → not found in the text, only in the listed references → moved to "Other sources"
*Original reference 8 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 5
*Original reference 9 → revised to <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> 6
I hope this explains my reference revisions. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 19:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:10, 10 June 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Gram-negative, rod (bacillus) shaped, non-motile, non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobic bacteria that are not capsualted. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology and Health Sciences [Categories OK]
 Subgroup categories:  Microbiology and Infectious Disease
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Explaining my revision of references

All of the references when I first looked at this article were marked in the main text using HTML (as <sup>number</sup>) and then simply listed manually in the References section. I therefore began to revise them to the <ref></ref> format:

  • Original reference 1 → revised to <ref></ref> 1
  • Original reference 2 → not found in the text, only in the listed references → moved to "Other sources"
  • Original reference 3 → revised to <ref></ref> 2
  • Original reference 4 → revised to <ref></ref> 3
  • Original reference 5 → revised to <ref></ref> 4
  • Original reference 6 → not found in the text and web link no longer available → deleted
  • Original reference 7 → not found in the text, only in the listed references → moved to "Other sources"
  • Original reference 8 → revised to <ref></ref> 5
  • Original reference 9 → revised to <ref></ref> 6

I hope this explains my reference revisions. Milton Beychok 19:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)