Talk:Sexual dimorphism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kim van der Linde
(not really a hobby as far as I can tell)
imported>Joe Quick
(subpages template)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Sexual dimorphism
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 = Agriculture
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = Y
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:41, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
}}


== Definition? ==
== Definition? ==

Latest revision as of 22:47, 9 November 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The physical differences that exist between males and females of a given species. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology, Agriculture and Hobbies [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Dogs
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Definition?

I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms must be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.

You forgot to sign :P
I always think of this as readily apparent differences in animals, which would make both the new edit and the addition of plants with different sexual components inaccurate. I'm not a biologist, so I think we'll have to ask the experts.
Aleta Curry 22:57, 1 August 2007 (CDT)