Talk:Quantum mechanics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
(big cleanup)
 
imported>Aleksander Stos
(category question)
Line 12: Line 12:


I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article.  [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article.  [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
==Math?==
There is a question how do we manage quantum mechanics articles, i.e. whether  we put it under Math Workgroup or not. [[User:Jitse Niesen]] has just removed the math category. Consider however this post by [[User:Greg Woodhouse]] on forum. I'm leaning to Greg's point of view. See also AMS classification on [[CZ:Mathematics Workgroup]], quantum theory is a notable node. Any thoughts? --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 09:24, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:24, 16 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Quantum mechanics"
Workgroup category or categories Physics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Bruce M.Tindall

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article. Bruce M.Tindall 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

Math?

There is a question how do we manage quantum mechanics articles, i.e. whether we put it under Math Workgroup or not. User:Jitse Niesen has just removed the math category. Consider however this post by User:Greg Woodhouse on forum. I'm leaning to Greg's point of view. See also AMS classification on CZ:Mathematics Workgroup, quantum theory is a notable node. Any thoughts? --AlekStos 09:24, 16 April 2007 (CDT)