Talk:Python (programming language): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(→‎Article name: new section)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (→‎Illustrations?: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:


This should be at [[Python (programming language)]], no? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
This should be at [[Python (programming language)]], no? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
== Illustrations? ==
Perhaps [[:Image:Python-cheat-sheet-v1.png]] may be of use here. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:36, 23 July 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Dynamic object-oriented, general purpose interpreted programming language. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Computers [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive 1  English language variant British English

High abstraction level

I am missing a useful comment on the fact that since it is a very high-level interpreted scripting language, it is not as fast as a compiled program.
--Morten Juhl Johansen 06:42, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

I think the issue is a little more complicated, because python code can theoretically be JIT-compiled, which would make it run at the speed of a natively compiled program. I'm not sure about the current state of compilers/VMs though. But the statement is indeed true of CPython. --Ion Alexandru Morega 07:05, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

Article name

This should be at Python (programming language), no? J. Noel Chiappa 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT)

Illustrations?

Perhaps Image:Python-cheat-sheet-v1.png may be of use here. Daniel Mietchen 21:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)