Talk:Protoscience: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Olav Næss No edit summary |
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Article checklist) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Protoscience | |||
| cat1 = | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = 4 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 21:47, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
I am posting modified versions of the WP article both here and in the Norwegian WP - because I, in my article Ormus matter, classify the field as a protoscience. It was strange to see that the thorough Pseudoscience discussion doesn't mention protoscience at all. I suppose it is mainly needed as a defense against the bloodthirsty WP hounds when they cry "Pseudoscience! Delete!". (As they cried while I in vain tried to plead protoscience status for my Ormus matter article there) [[User:Olav Næss|Olav Næss]] 10:00, 6 April 2007 (CDT) | I am posting modified versions of the WP article both here and in the Norwegian WP - because I, in my article Ormus matter, classify the field as a protoscience. It was strange to see that the thorough Pseudoscience discussion doesn't mention protoscience at all. I suppose it is mainly needed as a defense against the bloodthirsty WP hounds when they cry "Pseudoscience! Delete!". (As they cried while I in vain tried to plead protoscience status for my Ormus matter article there) [[User:Olav Næss|Olav Næss]] 10:00, 6 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 11 April 2007
| Workgroup category or categories | No categories listed [Editors asked to check categories] |
| Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
| Underlinked article? | Yes |
| Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
| Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 21:47, 11 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I am posting modified versions of the WP article both here and in the Norwegian WP - because I, in my article Ormus matter, classify the field as a protoscience. It was strange to see that the thorough Pseudoscience discussion doesn't mention protoscience at all. I suppose it is mainly needed as a defense against the bloodthirsty WP hounds when they cry "Pseudoscience! Delete!". (As they cried while I in vain tried to plead protoscience status for my Ormus matter article there) Olav Næss 10:00, 6 April 2007 (CDT)