Talk:Politics: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Since nobody has dissented, I propose shortly to give effect to Martin Baldwin-Edwards' suggestion and make a fresh start. - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 02:35, 18 November 2007 (CST) | Since nobody has dissented, I propose shortly to give effect to Martin Baldwin-Edwards' suggestion and make a fresh start. - [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 02:35, 18 November 2007 (CST) | ||
Especially as this is an imported article [from WP or where??] I doubt that there will be an objection. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 11:17, 20 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:17, 20 November 2007
Is that it ?
Does anyone have plans to complete this article? My first reaction as a newcomer to this workgroup was that this article must be "under construction", but the history page seems to indicate that nothing of substance has been added since July, and not a great deal since November. Surely we can't leave it as it is - with the only reference to democracy being Aristotle's "rule by the poor" and no links to Locke, Mill etc, and nothing on ideologies or forms of government. Can we? Nick Gardner 05:12, 15 November 2007 (CST)
I dislike the whole article,and am inclined to say we should scrap it and start again. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:36, 15 November 2007 (CST)
Since nobody has dissented, I propose shortly to give effect to Martin Baldwin-Edwards' suggestion and make a fresh start. - Nick Gardner 02:35, 18 November 2007 (CST)
Especially as this is an imported article [from WP or where??] I doubt that there will be an objection. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 11:17, 20 November 2007 (CST)