Talk:Pierre Molinier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Article style: seems very non-encyclopedic to me) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::::It seems very strange to me, very unencyclopedic; I don't see how it could possibly be considered for Approval. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 14:18, 11 July 2007 (CDT) | :::::It seems very strange to me, very unencyclopedic; I don't see how it could possibly be considered for Approval. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 14:18, 11 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 11 July 2007
Article style
There is a lot of good information here, but as an encyclopedia entry it should be written in prose rather than listed in the form of a timeline. -- Eric Winesett 12:14, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- Molinier's Biography will be ready in a prose form within a few days. Pierre Petit 08:11, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
Dr. Petit has requested that we help with copyediting (and dividing into paragraphs, no doubt). --Larry Sanger 09:16, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
- Can do.--Robert W King 09:16, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
- This is the first revision of the entry. If there are any mistakes, comments, errors, then by all means let me know. --Robert W King 12:52, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
- Well, for one thing, the present tense ought to disappear! Hayford Peirce 10:19, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
- I heavily edited the original to remove the present tense and to make it more "readable"(in terms of flow) and less "timeline", but it was Dr. Petit's preference to change it back and I am in no position to question that.--Robert W King 13:54, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
- It seems very strange to me, very unencyclopedic; I don't see how it could possibly be considered for Approval. Hayford Peirce 14:18, 11 July 2007 (CDT)